George Bruton, Petitioner,v.Dr. James B. Peake, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 27, 2008
0320080084 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 27, 2008)

0320080084

08-27-2008

George Bruton, Petitioner, v. Dr. James B. Peake, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


George Bruton,

Petitioner,

v.

Dr. James B. Peake,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Petition No. 0320080084

MSPB No. CH0752060580I1

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

Petitioner filed a timely petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission asking for review of a Final Order issued by the Merit

Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning his claim of discrimination in

violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation

Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.

In an appeal to the MSPB, petitioner alleged that he was discriminated

against on the basis of disability (knee) when he was removed from his

position of Housekeeping Aid, effective May 12, 2006, on the charge

of being absent without official leave (AWOL). Briefly, the record

establishes that petitioner sustained a work-related injury to his knee

in April 2002, and received workers' compensation benefits as a result,

including light duty assignments on a schedule limited to four hours per

day. In 2005, the Department of Labor's Office of Workers' Compensation

Programs (OWCP) determined, following a series of medical evaluations,

that petitioner's condition had improved and he was able to work a

full-time schedule. The agency offered petitioner a full-time light

duty position consistent with his medical restrictions that had been

approved by OWCP. Petitioner declined the position and OWCP terminated

his benefits. The agency then ordered petitioner back to work. Petitioner

returned to work, but did not work full days, so the agency charged him

AWOL for the hours he did not work. Thereafter, the agency removed him

from his position and petitioner appealed his removal to the MSPB.

A hearing was held and a MSPB Administrative Judge (AJ) issued an

initial decision upholding the removal. Petitioner sought review

by the full Board, wherein he argued that he had appealed the OWCP

termination of his workers' compensation benefits, and the Employees'

Compensation Appeals Board reversed the earlier finding and reinstated

petitioner's benefits. The Board found that in light of this award,

the AWOL charge could not be sustained. Thus, the Board ordered that

the removal be cancelled and petitioner be reinstated with back pay,

interest, and other relief. Petitioner then filed the instant petition.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(a) states that once a petition

is filed, the Commission will examine it and determine whether the

Commission will consider the decision of the MSPB. After reviewing the

instant petition and the full record, the Commission declines to consider

the July 3, 2008 decision of the MSPB. Accordingly, the petitioner's

petition for review is denied. A determination of the Commission not to

consider the decision shall not be used as evidence with respect to any

issue of discrimination in any judicial proceeding concerning that issue.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(b).

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

August

27,

2008

_______________________________

_____________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director Date

Office of Federal Operations

2

0320080084

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036