Freddie W. Smith, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 24, 2008
0120083233 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 24, 2008)

0120083233

09-24-2008

Freddie W. Smith, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Freddie W. Smith,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120083233

Agency No. 4A110006608

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's decision dated June 12, 2008 dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29

U.S.C. � 791 et seq. In his complaint, complainant alleged that he

was subjected to discrimination on the basis of his disability (sciatic

nerve damage) when on or about January 18, 2008, he received notice from

the Department of Labor informing him that his claim with the Office of

Workers' Compensation Programs (OWCP) was denied based on the agency's

challenge of his claim of an on-the-job injury.

The agency dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim.

The agency stated that complainant's complaint pertains to the agency's

processing of his claim with OWCP and that his concerns should properly be

addressed by the Department of Labor. On appeal, complainant contends

that the agency discriminatorily provided false information to OWCP

which resulted in his claim being denied.

Where a complainant alleges that the agency discriminated in a manner

pertaining to the merits of the workers' compensation claim, for example,

by submitting paperwork containing allegedly false information, then the

complaint does not state an EEO claim. Pirozzi v. Department of the Navy,

EEOC Request No. 05970146 (October 23, 1998)(allegedly false statements

made by agency to OWCP during OWCP's processing of a workers' compensation

claim goes to merits of compensation claim); Hogan v. Department of

the Army, EEOC Request No. 05940407 (September 29, 1994) (reviewing

an allegation that agency officials provided misleading statements to

OWCP would require the Commission to essentially determine what workers'

compensation benefits the complainant would likely have received); Reloj

v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05960545 (June 15,

1998) (allegation that agency's provision of false information to the OWCP

resulted in denial of benefits is a collateral attack on OWCP's decision

and, thus, fails to state a claim). Because complainant's complaint in

the case at hand concerns allegedly false information provided to the

OWCP by the agency, the allegation fails to state a claim. The proper

forum for complainant to raise these challenges is before the Department

of Labor. Accordingly, we affirm the agency's final decision.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 24, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120083233

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120083233