Fred S. Nockroes, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 28, 2002
01A23258 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 28, 2002)

01A23258

08-28-2002

Fred S. Nockroes, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Fred S. Nockroes v. United States Postal Service

01A23258

August 28, 2002

.

Fred S. Nockroes,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A23258

Agency No. 4G-780-0439-01

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint

was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) and

�1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact and for failure

to state a claim. In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was

subjected to discrimination on the basis of sex (male) when: (1) in

November 1998, he was sexually harassed by a female co-worker when she

alleged that he was being abused by his wife and put her telephone number

in his pocket; and (2) in August 2001, he learned that this co-worker was

being returned to the station where complainant worked and on January 11,

2002, the female worker looked at him up and down and blinked her eye.

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event in claim

one occurred on November 23, 1998, but complainant did not initiate

contact with an EEO Counselor until August 10, 2001, which is beyond

the forty-five (45) day limitation period. On appeal, complainant has

presented no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension

of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact. Accordingly,

the Commission finds that the agency's final decision to dismiss claim

one in the complaint as untimely was proper and the decision is affirmed.

The agency dismissed claim two on the grounds that it failed to state

a claim. Complainant alleged that he learned that the co-worker who

allegedly had harassed him in November 1998, was being returned to

the station and on January 22, 2002, she looked at him up and down and

blinked her eye. After a review of the record, the Commission finds that

complainant failed to establish any job related harm or injury due to the

alleged action of the co-worker or inaction of the agency. The Commission

finds that the agency's decision to dismiss claim two in the complaint

for failure to state a claim was proper and the decision is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS- ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 28, 2002

__________________

Date