01985167
08-26-1999
Francisco Lao, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Francisco Lao v. United States Postal Service
01985167
August 26, 1999
Francisco Lao, )
Appellant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01985167
) Agency No. A94N401C9606958
William J. Henderson, )
Postmaster General, )
United States Postal Service, )
Agency. )
______________________________)
DISMISSAL OF APPEAL
On April 18, 1997, appellant filed a formal complaint alleging
discrimination on the bases of race (Hispanic), national origin (not
specified), and age (59) in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act
of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination
in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. �621 et seq. when:
(1) On June 24, 1996, appellant was taken off of his route, and assigned
to a different route; and (2) On December 6, 1996, the work hours of
his bid assignment were changed.
In a final agency decision dated June 27, 1997, the agency dismissed
appellant's complaint, and appellant appealed to the Commission in EEOC
Appeal No. 01975621. In a decision dated May 6, 1998, the Commission
affirmed the dismissal of allegation (1), but reversed the dismissal of
allegation (2), and remanded the allegation for investigation. While the
investigation was ongoing, an arbitration decision from a union grievance
was issued on May 1, 1997, regarding the same matter raised in allegation
(2). On September 8, 1998, the agency completed its investigation of
the allegation. However, the record does not contain evidence of a
final agency decision or request for a hearing on allegation (2).
On June 9, 1998, appellant filed an appeal with this Commission from the
arbitrator's decision. The Commission has jurisdiction over appeals from
an arbitrator's final decision when an issue of employment discrimination
was raised in a negotiated grievance process that allows allegations
of discrimination to be raised, but that requires the complainant
to proceed under either the grievance or statutory EEO process, but
not both. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.401(c). The collective bargaining
agreement between appellant's union and the agency, however, does not
require complainants to elect a forum; it allows complainants to raise
discrimination allegations in both the EEO and negotiated grievance
processes. EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.401(c) states, in part, that
a grievant may not file an appeal of an arbitrator's decision to the
Commission, if 5 U.S.C. �7121(d) does not apply to the agency involved
in the grievance. Therefore, the Commission lacks jurisdiction over the
arbitrator's decision. Further, there is no evidence that the agency
has issued an EEO final agency decision from which appellant could appeal
to the Commission. Accordingly, appellant's appeal is hereby DISMISSED
for lack of jurisdiction.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the
date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action
is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)
CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult
an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction
in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT
IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
August 26, 1999
____________________________
DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations