Francisco J. Villarreal, Petitioner,v.John M. McHugh, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 12, 2011
0320110025 (E.E.O.C. May. 12, 2011)

0320110025

05-12-2011

Francisco J. Villarreal, Petitioner, v. John M. McHugh, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.




Francisco J. Villarreal,

Petitioner,

v.

John M. McHugh,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Petition No. 0320110025

MSPB No. SF315H110186I1

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

Petitioner filed a petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC) asking for review of a Final Order issued by the Merit

Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning his claim of discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

On December 8, 2010, Petitioner filed an appeal with the MSPB. In his

appeal, Petitioner alleged that the Agency discriminated against him

on the bases of race (Hispanic) and color (brown) when he was removed

from the Student Trainee position, GS-0899-04, effective November 12,

2010, during his probationary period.1 On February 10, 2011, an MSPB

Administrative Judge (AJ) issued an initial decision finding that the

Board lacked jurisdiction over the matter because Petitioner was a

probationary employee and because he was not alleging discrimination

based on martial status or partisan political reasons. Petitioner did

not file a petition with the full Board to review the initial decision.

Instead, although he was not provided appeal rights to the EEOC, he

filed this instant petition with the EEOC. Petitioner merely provided

a copy of the MSPB initial decision with no statement indicating why he

felt the decision was incorrect.

The record indicates that, on December 28, 2010, Petitioner also filed a

formal complaint regarding his removal with the Agency. The complaint

was designated, Agency No. ARCELA10DEC05280. On January 24, 2011, the

Agency dismissed Petitioner’s formal complaint on the grounds that he

had already filed an MSPB appeal on the same matter. A review of the

EEOC’s records indicates that Petitioner did not file an appeal of

the Agency’s January 24, 2011 final decision.

When the MSPB has denied jurisdiction in such matters, the Commission

has held that there is little point in continuing to view the matter

as a “mixed case” as defined by 29 C.F.R. § 1614.302(a). Thus,

the case will be considered a “non-mixed” matter and processed

accordingly. See generally Schmitt v. Dept. of Transportation, EEOC

Appeal No. 01902126 (July 9, 1990); Phillips v. Dept. of the Army, EEOC

Request No. 05900883 (October 12, 1990); 29 C.F.R. § 1614.302(c)(2)(i)

and (ii). In accordance with these principles, Petition No. 0320110025

is hereby administratively closed, and the matter is referred to the

Agency for further processing as outlined below.

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Petitioner is advised by operation of 29 C.F.R. § 1614.302(b), the Agency

is required to process the allegations of discrimination pursuant to 29

C.F.R. § 1614.105 et seq. The Agency shall notify Petitioner of the

right to contact an EEO counselor within forty five (45) days of receipt

of this decision, and to file an EEO complaint, subject to 29 C.F.R §�

�1614.107.2 The date on which the Petitioner filed the appeal with the

MSPB shall be deemed the date of initial contact with the EEO counselor.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory.

The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar

days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall

be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC

20013. The Agency’s report must contain supporting documentation, and

the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the

Agency does not comply with the Commission’s order, the Complainant

may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. §�

�1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action

to enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following

an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407,

1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant

has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in

accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File A Civil

Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).

If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.409.

PETITIONER’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0610)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission’s decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court, based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

“Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and

not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__5/12/11________________

Date

1 The Commission considers the term, “Hispanic,” to be an indication

of national origin not race.

2 The Agency is advised that Petitioner’s prior complaint and its

dismissal should not act as an impediment to his filing a new complaint.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0320110025

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0320110025