Frances G. Brown, Complainant,v.Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 8, 2011
0120091660 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 8, 2011)

0120091660

03-08-2011

Frances G. Brown, Complainant, v. Ray Mabus, Secretary, Department of the Navy, Agency.


Frances G. Brown,

Complainant,

v.

Ray Mabus,

Secretary,

Department of the Navy,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120091660

Agency No. 9465889002

DISMISSAL

On February 14, 2009, Complainant initially filed an appeal with this

Commission, apparently from a January 15, 2009 letter from the Office

of Personnel Management (OPM) indicating her application for disability

retirement was incomplete and could not be acted upon. She apparently

simultaneously filed a similar appeal with the Merit Systems Protection

Board (MSPB) concerning the same matter. She later sought review by

this Commission of decisions of the MSPB on her appeal.

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Supervisory Staff Accountant, GS-12, at the Agency's Naval Aviation

Depot facility in Pensacola, Florida. The documents Complainant filed

with the Commission indicate that in her appeal to the MSPB she alleged

discrimination on the bases of race (African-American), sex (female),

and disability (mental) in connection with her application for disability

retirement.

Information submitted by Complainant indicates that the MSPB issued

an initial decision on June 8, 2009, dismissing the matter for lack of

jurisdiction. In that decision, the MSPB Administrative Judge (AJ) noted

that Complainant had filed her appeal prematurely as OPM had not yet

made a decision on her disability benefits because her application was

incomplete. Once Complainant provided OPM with a complete application,

OPM would make a decision on the application. The MSPB AJ indicated

that if the application was denied, Complainant could request OPM

reconsideration of the denial. If Complainant did not prevail in the

reconsideration decision, OPM would provide Complainant the right to

appeal to the MSPB. Therefore, Complainant's February 14, 2009 appeal

to the MSPB was dismissed for lack of current jurisdiction. On October

9, 2009, Complainant sought review by the full Board, which denied the

petition.

EEOC regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over

allegations of discrimination raised in connection with an action

appealable to the MSPB. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.302. Here, however, the MSPB

dismissed the matter pending a final decision from OPM. The Commission

has no jurisdiction over procedural matters of the Board. Because the

MSPB did not address any matters within the Commission's jurisdiction, the

Commission has no jurisdiction to review Complainant's claims. Further,

because Complainant may still raise the matter with the MSPB after OPM

issues a final decision, the matter is not yet ripe for adjudication.

Accordingly, the Commission dismisses the instant appeal.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 8, 2011

__________________

Date

2

0120091660

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120091660