Floyd G. Jordan, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 28, 2003
01A33045_r (E.E.O.C. Aug. 28, 2003)

01A33045_r

08-28-2003

Floyd G. Jordan, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Floyd G. Jordan v. United States Postal Service

01A33045

August 28, 2003

.

Floyd G. Jordan,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A33045

Agency No. 4J-604-0053-03

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's final decision dated March 31, 2003, dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.

In the instant formal complaint, filed on February 25, 2003, complainant

alleged that he was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race

(African-American), sex (male), color (unspecified), age (D.O.B. 6/4/48),

and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when on January 7, 2003, he was

notified that he was not eligible for the �early out� retirement in 1992.

The agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1),

on the grounds that it states the same claim raised in his previous

complaint (Agency No. 4J-604-0040-02). The record reflects that in

4J-604-0040-02, complainant claimed that in December 2001, he learned

that agency employees received accrued benefits after they were no longer

employed, and he did not; and that in December 2001, the agency refused

to withdraw his resignation.<1>

The agency also determined that the matter raised in the instant complaint

appeared to �once again [describe] dates and incidents that have had

decisions rendered by the MSPB. . .�

Regarding the MSPB's relevance to the instant complaint, the record in

this case reflects that in July 2000, complainant wrote to the agency,

claiming benefits of an �early out� retirement program were offered to

certain agency employees in 1992; and that on August 15, 2000, the agency

responded that complainant was not eligible for those benefits because he

lacked the required years of service and had not reached the minimum age.

Complainant filed an appeal from the agency's August 15, 2000 response

to the MSPB. The MSPB dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

(MSPB Docket No. CHO752000838-I-1).

Thereafter, complainant filed an appeal from the MSPB decision with the

United States Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit. In a decision

issued on July 16, 2002, the Court affirmed the MSPB dismissal �without

prejudice to any claim that [complainant] might have with another agency.�

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides that

the agency shall dismiss a complaint that states the same claim that is

pending before or has been decided by the agency or Commission.

The Commission determines that the alleged incident in the prior complaint

(Agency No. 4J-604-0040-02) and the incident raised in the instant

complaint are not identical. Specifically, the record reflects that the

matter raised in Agency No. 4J-604-0040-02 relates to other employees

receiving accrued benefits after they were no longer employed while

complainant did not receive accrued benefits (December 10, 2001); and

when on December 17, 2001, the agency refused to withdraw complainant's

resignation. In contrast, the instant complaint addresses the claim when

on January 7, 2003, complainant was notified that he was not eligible

for the �early out� retirement in 1992.

It has long been established that "identical" does not mean "similar." The

Commission has consistently held that in order for a complaint to be

dismissed as identical, the elements of the complaint must be identical

to the elements of the prior complaint in time, place, incident,

and parties. See Jackson v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal

No. 01955890 (April 5, 1996). The matters raised in Agency 4J-604-0040-02

(other employees receiving accrued benefits after they were no longer

employed while complainant did not; and the agency's refusal to withdraw

complainant's resignation) do not address the identical issue as raised

in the instant complaint.

Moreover, the Commission notes that although the issue of complainant's

eligibility for a 1992 �early out� retirement may have been addressed

in an appeal to the MSPB which was dismissed, the United States Court

of Appeal when affirming the MSPB dismissal, stated that it affirmed the

MSPB dismissal without prejudice to any claim that complainant may have

with another agency.

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss complainant's complaint on

the grounds that it raises the same matter that was raised in a prior

complaint and/or before the MSPB was improper, and is hereby REVERSED.

The complaint is REMANDED to the agency for further processing in

accordance with the ORDER below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 28, 2003

__________________

Date

1The record reflects that Agency

No. 4J-604-0040-02 was the subject of a Commission decision that affirmed

the agency's dismissal of this complaint, on the grounds it constituted a

collateral attack on a decision by the Merits Systems Protection Board,

dated November 29, 2001. Jordan v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. 01A24315

(January 6, 2003).