Ex Parte ZeollaDownload PDFPatent Trial and Appeal BoardNov 4, 201312083304 (P.T.A.B. Nov. 4, 2013) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 12/083,304 04/09/2008 Giuseppe Zeolla 54478 7499 7590 11/04/2013 Roylance Abrams Berdo & Goodman 1300 19th Street NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20036 EXAMINER BAUER, CASSEY D ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 3744 MAIL DATE DELIVERY MODE 11/04/2013 PAPER Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD ____________________ Ex parte GIUSEPPE ZEOLLA ____________________ Appeal 2012-000412 Application 12/083,304 Technology Center 3700 ____________________ Before: CHARLES N. GREENHUT, MICHAEL L. HOELTER, and ANNETTE R. REIMERS, Administrative Patent Judges. GREENHUT, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appeal 2012-000412 Application 12/083,304 2 STATEMENT OF CASE Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a rejection of claims 8- 15. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse. The claims are directed to a cooling device with a filter unit. Claim 8, reproduced below, is illustrative of the claimed subject matter: 8. A cooling device, comprising: a cooling unit through which a fluid to be cooled can flow; a filter unit for filtering the fluid extending on one longitudinal side of said cooling unit, said filter unit having a filter housing with a filter element held in an installation space within said filter housing; and a first fluid collecting chamber located between said filter unit and said cooling unit and having a uniform flow cross- section along an entire length thereof, said first fluid collecting chamber being sealed relative to said filter unit by an at least partially concavely curved first boundary wall, said first fluid collecting chamber having a second boundary wall in a middle thereof dividing said fluid collecting chamber into first and second component spaces, said first component space having a fluid connection to said filter housing, said first fluid collecting chamber being semicircular in transverse cross section and having a flat connection wall engaging a face of said cooling unit, said first component space being in fluid communication via said cooling unit with said second component space, said second component space being fluid tight relative said filter unit and having an outlet for discharging filtered and cooled fluid. Appeal 2012-000412 Application 12/083,304 3 REFERENCES The prior art relied upon by the Examiner in rejecting the claims on appeal is: Galbraith Whitlow US 975,612 US 6,622,517 B1 Nov. 15, 1910 Sep. 23, 2003 REJECTIONS Claims 8-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Whitlow and Galbraith. Ans. 4. OPINION The Examiner found Whitlow’s manifold chamber 80, interpreted as the recited, “first fluid collecting chamber,” to have uniform flow cross- section based on Whitlow’s statement that “[t]he manifold portion is formed from another member having a constant cross sectional profile along its length.” Ans. 13, citing Whitlow col 2, ll. 33-34. While the manifold may be “formed from” such a structure, once assembled into Whitlow’s condenser, tubes 18 clearly combine with manifold member 74 to create a flow cross- section in manifold chamber 80 that is not uniform along an entire length thereof. See figs. 2, 3a,b. Whitlow does not disclose or express any other construction. Thus, the Examiner incorrectly found Whitlow’s manifold to have uniform flow cross-section along an entire length thereof as required by independent claim 8. The Examiner does not offer any reasoning to account for this distinction. Appeal 2012-000412 Application 12/083,304 4 DECISION The Examiner’s rejection is reversed. REVERSED mls Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation