Ex Parte Yelehanka et alDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesJun 14, 201211466350 (B.P.A.I. Jun. 14, 2012) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARKOFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 11/466,350 08/22/2006 Pradeep Ramachandramurthy Yelehanka 1016-021.D1.C1 1884 22898 7590 06/14/2012 ISHIMARU & ASSOCIATES LLP 2055 GATEWAY PLACE SUITE 700 SAN JOSE, CA 95110 EXAMINER TRAN, LONG K ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 2829 MAIL DATE DELIVERY MODE 06/14/2012 PAPER Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte PRADEEP RAMACHANDRAMURTHY YELEHANKA, TONG QING CHEN, ZHI YONG HAN, ZHEN JIA ZHENG, KELVIN ONG, TIAN HAO GU, and SYN KEAN CHEAH ________________ Appeal 2010-001933 Application 11/466,350 Technology Center 2800 ________________ Before JOHN A. JEFFERY, CARL W. WHITEHEAD, JR., and ANDREW CALDWELL, Administrative Patent Judges. CALDWELL, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appeal 2010-001933 Application 11/466,350 2 SUMMARY Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a) from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-5. We reverse. STATEMENT OF CASE Appellants describe the present invention as an integrated circuit including a local interconnect opening. Abstract. Independent claim 1 is illustrative: 1. An integrated circuit comprising: a semiconductor substrate having a first gate dielectric and a first gate respectively on and over the semiconductor substrate, the semiconductor substrate having a junction adjacent the first gate dielectric; a first liner over the semiconductor substrate around the first gate; a first spacer on the first liner; a first shaped spacer on the first spacer; a first dielectric layer over the semiconductor substrate having a local interconnect opening provided therein; a second dielectric layer over the first dielectric layer having a local interconnect opening provided therein; and a conductive material in the local interconnect openings. The Examiner relies on the following as evidence of unpatentability: Ootsuka US 2004/0253790 A1 Dec. 16 2004 (filed May 28, 2004) Appeal 2010-001933 Application 11/466,350 3 REJECTION The Examiner rejected claims 1-5 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Ootsuka. ANALYSIS This application is a continuation of application 11/045,202 filed January 27, 2005, which is a divisional of application 10/359,975 filed February 27, 2003. Claims 1-5 of this application are identical to claims 11- 15 of the ‘975 application. Our review of this application file and the prior application files identified above has determined that this application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the ‘975 application. Ootsuka, with a filing date of May 28, 2004, is not prior art under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) since Ootsuka was filed after this application’s effective filing date of February 27, 2003. Nor is Ootsuka prior art under any other section of 35 U.S.C. § 102. Although Appellants never raised this issue in either the Supplemental Appeal Brief filed on April 10, 2009 or in the Reply Brief filed on September 8, 2009, we raise this issue on our own. Since Ootsuka is not prior art, we need not address the issues raised by Appellants in either the Supplemental Appeal Brief or the Reply Brief or by the Examiner in the Answer mailed on July 8, 2009. Accordingly, the rejection of claims 1-5 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Ootsuka is reversed. Appeal 2010-001933 Application 11/466,350 4 DECISION The Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-5 is reversed. REVERSED rwk Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation