Ex Parte Yang et alDownload PDFPatent Trial and Appeal BoardOct 30, 201815157607 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 30, 2018) Copy Citation UNITED STA TES p A TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE 15/157,607 16708 7590 Bing K Yen P.O.Box 1538 Cupertino, CA 95015 05/18/2016 11/01/2018 FIRST NAMED INVENTOR Hongxin Yang UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www .uspto.gov ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. AVALANCHE-0173US 6744 EXAMINER AHMAD, KHAJA ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 2813 NOTIFICATION DATE DELIVERY MODE 11/01/2018 ELECTRONIC Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. Notice of the Office communication was sent electronically on above-indicated "Notification Date" to the following e-mail address(es): bing.k. yen@gmail.com bing@ avalanche-technology. com PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte HONGXIN YANG, KIMIHIRO SATOH, and XIAOBINWANG Appeal2018-004714 Application 15/157,607 Technology Center 2800 Before JAMES C. HOUSEL, N. WHITNEY WILSON, and JEFFREY R. SNAY, Administrative Patent Judges. WILSON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner's May 8, 2017 decision finally rejecting claims 1-20. 1 We have jurisdiction over the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b ). We reverse. 1 Appellant is the Applicant, Avalanche Technology Incorporated, which is also identified as the real party in interest (Appeal Br. 2). Appeal2018-004714 Application 15/157 ,607 CLAIMED SUBJECT MATTER Appellant's disclosure is directed to a memory device which includes an array of memory cells (Abstract). Each memory cell includes a memory element connected to a two-terminal selector element (id.). The two- terminal selector element includes a first electrode and a second electrode with a switching layer in between (id.). The switching layer includes a plurality of metal-rich clusters embedded in a matrix (id.). Independent claims 1 and 20 are representative and are reproduced below from the Claims Appendix of the Appeal Brief: 1. A memory device comprising an array of memory cells, each of said memory cells including a memory element connected to a two-terminal selector element, said two-terminal selector element comprising a first electrode and a second electrode with a switching layer interposed therebetween, said switching layer including a plurality of metal-rich clusters embedded in a matrix, wherein said switching layer has single resistance state in absence of an applied voltage thereto. 20. A memory device comprising an array of memory cells, each of said memory cells including a memory element connected to a two-terminal selector element, said two-terminal selector element comprising a first electrode and a second electrode with a switching layer interposed therebetween, said switching layer including a plurality of metal-rich clusters embedded in a matrix, wherein each of said first and second electrodes is made of a material selected from the group consisting of iridium, ruthenium, and any combinations thereof. 2 Appeal2018-004714 Application 15/157 ,607 REJECTIONS I. Claims 1-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § I03(a) as unpatentable over Kuo 2 in view of Zhang. 3 II. Claim 20 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § I03(a) as unpatentable over Kuo in view of Zhang and Baek. 4 DISCUSSION The Examiner finds-and Appellant does not dispute-that Kuo discloses each of the elements of claim 1, except that Kuo does not teach that its switching layer S includes a plurality of metal-rich clusters embedded in a matrix (Final Act. 3, citing Kuo, FIGS. 1-7, ,r,r 16, 27). The Examiner finds that Zhang is "pertinent art," and discloses a resistive switching nonvolatile random access memory (ReRAM) formed using memory elements with two or more stable states with different resistances and having a metal insulator metal (MIM) structure (Final Act. 3). The Examiner further finds that Zhang discloses that its resistive memory devices can include metal nanoparticles in a matrix in a switching layer disposed between two electrodes in order to produce a structure with low power consumption and low switching current (Final Act. 3, citing Zhang, FIG. 10, ,r,r 8, 10). The Examiner also finds that Zhang's MIM structure "is an equivalent structure of the switching layer of Kuo because .. . their functionality is equivalent which is switching between ON (low resistance) and OFF (high resistance)" (Final Act. 3--4 ). The Examiner 2 Kuo et al., US 2014/0209892 Al, published July 31, 2014. 3 Zhang et al., US 2014/0264224 Al, published September 18, 2014. 4 Baek et al., US 2007/0159869 Al, published July 12, 2007. 3 Appeal2018-004714 Application 15/157 ,607 concludes that it would have been obvious to include metal rich clusters embedded in a matrix in Kuo' s device in order to have low power consumption and low switching current (Final Act. 4). Appellant argues, inter alia, that a person of skill in the art would not have substituted Zhang' s switching layer for Kuo' s switching layer. Appellant contends that Kuo's switching layer is a volatile structure (i.e. it is insulative in the absence of an applied voltage but conductive when an appropriate voltage is applied), so that it reverts to the insulative state when the voltage is removed, which prevents current leakage through the selector element when not being selected for read or write operation (Appeal Br. 7). By contrast, according to Appellant, Zhang' s switching layer is designed for a non-volatile memory, which means that it maintains its resistance level even after removal of the applied voltage (id.). Therefore, Appellant argues, a person of skill in the art would not have substituted Zhang' s switching layer into Kuo' s device because doing so would result in the selector element remaining conductive after removal of the applied voltage, which would cause current leakage (Appeal Br. 7-8). In response, the Examiner finds that the materials of Zhang' s insulator and the materials of Kuo are not the same and: Therefore, by including a plurality of metal-rich clusters in a matrix in the insulator ([0027]) of Kuo will not make the selector element (S, Figure 1 of Kuo) a nonvolatile element due to the difference between the materials of the insulator between the two electrodes, instead, by adding such metal-rich clusters in the insulator of Kuo will reduce the resistivity such that the turning ON current will be less for the selector element of Kuo, and hence the modification will provide a lower power 4 Appeal2018-004714 Application 15/157 ,607 consumption in the device of Kuo according to the teaching of Zhang ([001 OJ). (Ans. 5). However, as argued by Appellant (Reply Br. 5), Zhang teaches that its metal rich clusters act as permanent anchors for stabilizing conductive filaments which serve to reduce the tum-on current (Zhang, FIGS. 3A-3A). This can be seen because metal nanoparticles 322 and 323 do not move even as the conductive filaments are set and reset in FIGS. 3A, 3B, and 3C. Thus, the benefit of Zhang' s system cited by the Examiner to provide the necessary motivation to incorporate Zhang's metal particles into Kuo's system (low power consumption and low switching current) results from the Zhang's switching layer being non-volatile. Modifying that switching layer to make it volatile so that it would work with Kuo' s system would eliminate the advantage cited by the Examiner as motivatation for the modification. Accordingly, we conclude that Appellant has shown reversible error in the rejection of claim 1 over Kuo and Zhang, and we, therefore, reverse that rejection. The rejection of claim 20 over Kuo, Zhang, and Baek is reversed for the same reasons. CONCLUSION We REVERSE the rejection of claims 1-19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Kuo in view of Zhang. We REVERSE the rejection of claim 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Kuo in view of Zhang and Baek. REVERSED 5 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation