Ex Parte Veglio et alDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesJun 19, 201210790418 (B.P.A.I. Jun. 19, 2012) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/790,418 03/01/2004 Paolo Veglio 9562 1478 27752 7590 06/20/2012 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY Global Legal Department - IP Sycamore Building - 4th Floor 299 East Sixth Street CINCINNATI, OH 45202 EXAMINER CRAIG, PAULA L ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 3778 MAIL DATE DELIVERY MODE 06/20/2012 PAPER Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte PAOLO VEGLIO, IVANO GAGLIARDI, GIOVANNI CARLUCCI, ROBERTO D'ADDARIO, and VINCENZO PARTENZA ____________ Appeal 2010-002771 Application 10/790,418 Technology Center 3700 ____________ Before LINDA E. HORNER, MICHAEL C. ASTORINO, and JOHN W. MORRISON, Administrative Patent Judges. ASTORINO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE The Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-7 and 9-20. We have jurisdiction over the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We REVERSE. Appeal 2010-002771 Application 10/790,418 2 REJECTIONS Claims 1-4, 6, 7, 10, 12-14, 16, and 17 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Wang (US 4,713,069, issued Dec. 15, 1987) and Horney (US 5,549,589, issued Aug. 27, 1996). Claims 5, 9, and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Wang, Horney, and Kudo (US 2003/0187417 A1, published Oct. 2, 2003). Claims 15 and 18-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Wang, Horney, and Carstens (US 6,582,411 B1, issued Jun. 24, 2003). CLAIMED SUBJECT MATTER The claimed subject matter pertains to a sanitary napkin including, from top to bottom, a fluid permeable top sheet, an absorbent core, fluid impermeable barrier, and a fluid permeable backsheet. Spec. 2: 17, 18, 23- 25. Claims 1, 18, and 20 are the independent claims on appeal. Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and recites: 1. A sanitary napkin having a body-facing side and a garment- facing side, the sanitary napkin comprising a fluid permeable topsheet, a fluid permeable backsheet, and an absorbent core disposed therebetween, wherein, a. said absorbent core comprises relatively hydrophilic material defining a core outer periphery; b. said topsheet and said backsheet comprise relatively hydrophobic nonwoven material, at least one of said topsheet and said backsheet defining a sanitary napkin outer periphery that is substantially larger than said core outer periphery, the area between said core outer periphery and said sanitary napkin outer periphery being a breathable zone that completely surrounds said core outer periphery; Appeal 2010-002771 Application 10/790,418 3 c. said sanitary napkin further comprising a fluid impermeable barrier between said backsheet and said absorbent core, said fluid impermeable barrier being disposed within said core outer periphery and not extending beyond said core outer periphery, and d. wherein said garment-facing side has thereon pressure sensitive adhesive for affixing to a wearer's undergarment. Claims 18 and 20 also call for a sanitary napkin that includes a fluid permeable backsheet. App. Br., Claims Appendix. OPINION The Examiner finds that Wang’s sanitary pad 10 including a fluid pervious cover 13, absorbent material 12, central zone 14 of baffle 11, and non-central zone of baffle 11 corresponds to the sanitary napkin including a fluid permeable topsheet, absorbent core, fluid impermeable barrier, and a fluid permeable backsheet, respectively. Ans. 4. The Appellants contend that the baffle 11, which includes the non-central zone of baffle 11, is not a backsheet. See App. Br. 3. More specifically, the Appellants assert that the claimed backsheet “constitutes an outer layer on the garment-facing side of the sanitary napkin . . . . As such, the baffle 11 of Chen et al. [Wang] cannot constitute a backsheet as it is not an outer layer of the absorbent article.” App. Br. 3. Contrary to the Appellants’ construction of the term “backsheet” the Examiner determines that “[t]he claims do not require that the backsheet is an outer layer of the absorbent article.” Ans. 17. Thus, the issues presented in this appeal are: first, whether the term “backsheet” is required to be an outer layer; and second, whether the non-central zone of baffle 11 is a backsheet as claimed. Appeal 2010-002771 Application 10/790,418 4 First, when construing claim terminology in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, claims are to be given their broadest reasonable interpretation consistent with the specification, reading claim language in light of the specification as it would be interpreted by one of ordinary skill in the art. See In re Am. Acad. of Sci. Tech. Ctr., 367 F.3d 1359, 1364 (Fed. Cir. 2004). The Specification at page 4, lines 18-20 recites “[t]o provide a degree of softness and vapor permeability for the garment-facing side of pantiliner 10, a vapor permeable outer layer, referred to herein as backsheet 22, is provided adjacent the absorbent core 20 on the garment-facing side of the absorbent core 20.” (Italics added); see App. Br. 3. Thus, the Specification provides one of ordinary skill in the art with interpretative guidance of the term “backsheet” to be a garment-facing outer layer of a pantiliner or sanitary napkin.1 In re Morris, 127 F.3d 1048, 1054 (Fed. Cir. 1997) (“[I]t would be unreasonable for the PTO to ignore any interpretive guidance afforded by the applicant's written description.”); see In re Suitco Surface, Inc., 603 F.3d 1255, 1260 (Fed. Cir. 2010). This interpretation of “backsheet” to refer to a garment-facing outer layer is also consistent with the use of the term in the art. See, e.g., Horney, col. 12, ll. 13-15 (describing that Horney’s “backsheet 23 and the topsheet 22 are positioned adjacent the garment surface and the body surface, respectively, of sanitary napkin 20”), and col. 14, ll. 27-30 (describing that Horney’s “backsheet 23 prevents exudates absorbed and contained in the absorbent core 25 from wetting 1 The Specification at page 3, ll. 5-9, states “[w]hile the invention is disclosed in a particularly preferred embodiment of a pantiliner, the described invention can also be considered as a sanitary napkin, and all descriptions below with respect to pantiliners can be sanitary napkins as well, with the difference being one of degree rather than kind.” Appeal 2010-002771 Application 10/790,418 5 articles which contact the sanitary napkin 20 such as pants, pajamas and undergarments.”) Second, Wang describes that “sanitary pad 10 comprises baffle 11 and absorbent material 12 wrapped with a fluid pervious cover 13.” Wang, col. 14, ll. 4, 5, figs. 1, 2. As such, the non-central zone of baffle 11 is not an outer layer of a pantiliner or sanitary napkin that faces a garment because it is within the wrapping of the fluid pervious cover 13. See App. Br. 3. Further, the Examiner does not find that the underside of Wang’s fluid pervious cover 13 or Horney’s backsheet 23 corresponds to the backsheet as recited in the claims and as we construe the term. Thus, the rejection of claims 1-4, 6, 7, 10, 12-14, 16, and 17 as unpatentable over Wang and Horney is not sustained. The remaining rejections rely on the same erroneous finding as discussed above, i.e., that the non-central zone of baffle 11 is a backsheet as recited in the claims. Thus, the rejections of claims 5, 9, and 11, as unpatentable over Wang, Horney, and Kudo, and claims 15 and 18-20 as unpatentable over Wang, Horney, and Carstens are not sustained. DECISION We REVERSE the rejections of claims 1-7 and 9-20. REVERSED Klh Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation