Ex Parte Schrieffer et alDownload PDFPatent Trial and Appeal BoardOct 30, 201813813767 (P.T.A.B. Oct. 30, 2018) Copy Citation UNITED STA TES p A TENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE 13/813,767 02/01/2013 80711 7590 10/30/2018 BGL/ Ann Arbor 524 South Main Street Suite 200 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 UNITED ST A TES OF AMERICA FIRST NAMED INVENTOR Jorn Schrieffer UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www .uspto.gov ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 14423-074 1792 EXAMINER CHOI, CHARLES J ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 2133 MAIL DATE DELIVERY MODE 10/30/2018 PAPER Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte JORN SCHRIEFFER, JURGEN SCHERSCHMIDT, and THOMAS PIECHL Appeal2018-002383 Application 13/813, 7 67 Technology Center 2100 Before CARLA M. KRIVAK, JASON V. MORGAN, and JEREMY J. CURCURI, Administrative Patent Judges. KRIVAK, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from a final rejection of claims 1-9 and 11-15. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We reverse. Appeal2018-002383 Application 13/813,767 STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellants' invention is directed to "an electronic memory arrangement and to the use of the memory arrangement in motor vehicles" (Spec. ,r 2). Independent claim 1, reproduced below, is exemplary of the subject matter on appeal. 1. An electronic memory arrangement comprising: at least three memory areas; a memory control unit; a writing memory-accessing unit which is configured to carry out a write access; a reading memory-accessing unit which is configured to carry out a read access; wherein the memory control unit determines the write or read access to the at least three memory areas; wherein the memory control unit is configured such that after a writing of a first data packet to one of the at least three memory areas, a following second data packet to be written is written to one of the at least three memory areas to which the read access does not take place simultaneously during the write access of the second data packet; and the memory arrangement is configured to provide a selecting-reading sample mode, wherein after a transmission of a data freeze signal by the reading memory-accessing unit to the memory control unit, data are preserved in one of the at least three memory areas in an unchanged form for a defined period of time until data are actually read out, whereupon a further write access to a memory area last written to, wherein the further write access must be concluded, is prevented or blocked by the memory control unit until data have been read out of a memory area at a later time or until a new data freeze signal is sent by the reading memory-accessing unit. 2 Appeal2018-002383 Application 13/813,767 REJECTIONS and REFERENCES 1 The Examiner rejected claims 1-7, 9, and 11 under 35 U.S.C. § I03(a) based upon the teachings of Byrne (US 2007/0180297 Al; Aug. 2, 2007), Jackson (US 8,112,784 Bl; Feb. 7, 2012) and Fujimori (US 2007/0091498 Al; Apr. 26, 2007). The Examiner rejected claim 8 under 35 U.S.C. § I03(a) based upon the teachings of Byrne, Jackson, Fujimori, and Matsunami (US 5,802,345; Sept. 1, 1998). The Examiner rejected claim 12 under 35 U.S.C. § I03(a) based upon the teachings of Byrne, Jackson, Fujimori, and Conte (US 2010/0299481 Al; Nov. 25, 2010). The Examiner rejected claims 13 and 14 under 35 U.S.C. § I03(a) based upon the teachings of Byrne, Jackson, Fujimori, and Dickinson (US 2002/0069321 Al; June 6, 2002). The Examiner rejected claim 15 under 35 U.S.C. § I03(a) based upon the teachings of Byrne, Jackson, Fujimori, and Stence (US 2004/0044849 Al; Mar. 4, 2004). ANALYSIS Appellants contend the Examiner errs in finding Byrne does not explicitly teach the claim limitation "the read access does not take place simultaneously during the write access of the second data packet" ( emphasis 1 The Examiner claims rejected claimsl-15 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph (Final Act. 2). This rejection was withdrawn after Appellants corrected an antecedent basis problem in claim 1 (Advisory Act. Mailed Sept. 27, 2016). 3 Appeal2018-002383 Application 13/813,767 omitted), but finds Jackson teaches this limitation (Final Act. 4, citing Jackson col. 11, 11. 41--43). Specifically, Appellants contend, "Jackson only teaches that hard drives exist which cannot store and retrieve data simultaneously," therefore the storage device in Jackson is equivalent to an electronic memory arrangement (Br. 10). As such, Jackson does not disclose a memory capable of simultaneously storing and retrieving data, where, in one memory area, writing and reading does not occur at the same time (id.). "Even in combination with Byrne the person skilled in the art would not arrive at the present invention as neither Byrne nor Jackson give any hint how to combine multiple memory areas such that simultaneous write and read access to this electronic memory arrangement is possible while preventing a simultaneous write access and read access to a specific memory area" (id.). We agree. The Examiner has cited Jackson stating "Jackson in col. 11, lines 41- 43 shows examples of storage devices 408 as being hard drives which cannot both store and retrieve (i.e. write and read) data simultaneously" (Ans. 9-10). The Examiner, however, has not specifically identified how Jackson, in combination with Byrne and Fujimori, teaches or suggests multiple memory areas where simultaneous write and read access to the various memory areas is possible while preventing a simultaneous read access to a specific area. Thus, for these reasons we do not sustain the Examiner's rejection of claim 1 dependent claims 2-9 and 11-15 argued therewith. 4 Appeal2018-002383 Application 13/813,767 DECISION The Examiner's decision rejecting claims 1-9 and 11-15 is reversed. REVERSED 5 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation