Ex Parte Morando et alDownload PDFPatent Trial and Appeal BoardSep 11, 201711631885 (P.T.A.B. Sep. 11, 2017) Copy Citation United States Patent and Trademark Office UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313*1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 11/631,885 03/1 i/2008 Jorge A. Morando MLCZ 200132US01 9082 27885 7590 09/11/2017 EXAMINER FAY SHARPE LLP 1228 Euclid Avenue, 5th Floor STIMPERT, PHILIP EARL The Halle Building Cleveland, OH 44115 ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 3746 MAIL DATE DELIVERY MODE 09/11/2017 PAPER Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD Ex parte JORGE A. MORANDO, JON TIPTON, GEORGE JS. MORDUE, MARK BRIGHT, LENNARD LUTES, RICHARD S. HENDERSON, and CHRIS T. VILD1 Appeal 2016-001739 Application 11/631,885 Technology Center 3700 Before JOHN C. KERINS, JAMES P. CALVE, and BRANDON J. WARNER, Administrative Patent Judges. CALVE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Final Action rejecting claims 1, 7, 9, 10, 12, 57, 60, 62-64, 66-73, 75, and 76. Claims 2 6, 8, 11, 13-56, 58, and 61 are cancelled. Appeal Br. 11-16 (Claims Appendix). Claim 74 is allowed, and claims 59 and 65 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim. Final Act. 9. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We REVERSE. 1 Appellants identify the real party in interest as Pyrotek, Inc. Appeal Br. 1 Appeal 2016-001739 Application 11/631,885 CLAIMED SUBJECT MATTER Appellants disclose a connector between support posts and a motor support platform for leveling the motor support platform. See Spec, f 19. Claims 1, 9, 10, 69, and 71 are independent. Claim 1 is reproduced below. 1. A connector for connecting a post assembly of an associated molten metal pump to a motor mount, the connector • comprising: a side wall; an internal wall extending from the side wall and including an axially aligned opening adapted to receive an elongated rod, the side wall and the internal wall defining a lower receptacle adapted to receive a barrel nut of the post assembly and an upper receptacle adapted to cooperate with a motor mount or a structure connected to the motor mount, the barrel nut including a threaded opening adapted to align with the opening of the internal wall, and a fastener having a first end configured to engage the motor mount and a second end configured to engage the threaded opening of the barrel nut. REJECTIONS Claims 10, 12, 62, 64, and 68-73 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by Mordue (US 2003/0075844 Al, pub. Apr. 24, 2003).2 Final Act. 3-6. Claims 1, 7, 9, 57, 60, 63, 66, 67, 75, and 76 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Mordue and Fahnle (US 5,452,646, iss. Sept. 26, 1995).3 Final Act. 7-9. 2 Appellants identify only claims 10, 12, 62, 64, and 68-70 as subject to this rejection. Appeal Br. 7. 3 Although the caption of this rejection lists only claims 1, 7, 9, 57, 60, 63, and 66, the Examiner included findings for these claims and claims 67, 75, and 76. See Final Act. 7-9. 2 Appeal 2016-001739 Application 11/631,885 ANALYSIS Claims 10, 12, 62, 64, and 68-73 The Examiner found that Mordue discloses an adjustable connection including fastener 1049 having a first end (head end) configured to engage a motor mount and a second end (threaded end) configured to engage a cavity in a post, as recited in independent claims 10, 69, and 71. Final Act. 3-6. The Examiner interpreted “configured to engage” to mean that an element does not necessarily have to engage another element as long as it includes structure that allows it to do so. Id. at 3-4. The Examiner reasoned that fastener 1049 is attached to rod 1029, and rod 1029 extends into a cavity in post 1031, so fastener 1049 “at least indirectly engages the cavity.” Ans. 15. Appellants argue that Mordue’s fastener 1049 is a horizontal portion of bracket 1045 that includes a hole through which rod 1029 passes, but a second end of bracket 1045 is attached to a bolt of clamp 1047, rather than to a motor mount as claimed. Appeal Br. 7-8. Appellants also argue that fastener 1049 does not include any element configured to engage a cavity in the post, as claimed. Id. at 8. Appellants argue the structure of bracket 1045 and fastener 1049 lack the ability to perform the claimed limitations. Id. In particular, Appellants argue that fastener 1049 is attached to rod 1029, which engages a cavity in post 1031, but rod 1029 is not a fastener. Reply Br. 6. The Examiner has not established by a preponderance of evidence that Mordue discloses a fastener having a second end “configured to engage” a cavity in the post as recited in claim 10. We agree with the Examiner that fastener 1049 includes a first end configured to engage a motor mount. Final Act. 13. Fastener 1049 is part of bracket 1045, which attaches at one end to clamp 1047 on the motor mount. Mordue If 80, Fig. 19. 3 Appeal 2016-001739 Application 11/631,885 Mordue discloses that the other end of bracket 1045 is attached to rod 1029 by way of fastener 1049. Id. The configuration of fastener 1049 that attaches to rod 1029 is an aperture through which the upper end of rod 1029 passes, as shown in Figure 19. Mordue discloses that the upper end of rod 1029 extends through insulation layer 1023 and opening 1048 before being secured with nut 1041. Id.*\} 78, Figs. 19, 20. Thus, nut 1041 is configured to engage the upper end of rod 1029 via a threaded engagement that secures the upper end of rod 1029. However, fastener 1049 is configured as a flat plate with an aperture therethrough. Fastener 1049 attaches to rod 1029 via an aperture through which the upper end of rod 1049 passes. Id., Fig. 19. We are not persuaded that fastener 1049 is configured to engage a cavity in rod 1029 even if rod 1029 included a cavity at its upper end. See Final Act. 3 (citing Mordue 80). The Examiner’s alternate finding that fastener 1049 is configured to engage a cavity in the post (outer sheath 1031) by engaging rod 1029, which extends into a cavity in outer sheath 1031 (Ans. 15), does not explain how the fastener 1049 itself includes structure that can engage a cavity in post 1031, as the claim requires.4 The aperture and plate shape of fastener 1049 are not configurations that can engage a cavity in rod 1029 or post assembly 1031. Thus, we do not sustain the rejection of claims 10, 12, 62, 64, and 68-73. 4 Appellants disclose that threaded fastener 86 screws into threaded opening 88 in an upper end 84 of rod 42 to connect post assembly 32, which includes rod 42 encased in outer sheath 36, to motor mount plate 34. Spec. H 58, 59, Fig. 2. We interpret “configured to engage” in light of this disclosure and an ordinary meaning of “engage” to require a structure that directly “interlocks or meshes” with a cavity in the post. See Definition of engage by Merriam- Webster at http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/engage (last viewed Sept. 6, 2017) (“to interlock with: mesh” “to come together and interlock”). 4 Appeal 2016-001739 Application 11/631,885 Claims 1, 7, 9, 57, 60, 63, 66, 67, 76, and 76 as unpatentable over Mordue and Fahnle The Examiner found that Mordue discloses a connector, as recited in claim 1, including a post (post assembly 1027) and fastener 1049 with a first end configured to engage the motor mount and a second end (threaded end) configured to engage a cavity in the post, but not a barrel nut. Final Act. 7. The Examiner found that Fahnle teaches that elements of a pump are affixed with a barrel nut, and skilled artisans would appreciate that barrel nuts could be substituted for the nuts of Mordue as suitable alternate means of affixing pump parts to each other for predictable results. Id. at 7-8. The Examiner interpreted “configured to engage the threaded opening of the barrel nut” as not requiring a threaded engagement, as long as a corner of fastener 1049 is capable of being inserted into the threaded opening of the barrel nut. The Examiner reasoned that such insertion could allow the fastener to move the barrel nut, which could be considered engagement. Ans. 11. Appellants argue that claim 1 requires a post with an internal passage configured to receive a fastener, and there is no fastener disposed in the post of Mordue. Appeal Br. 5. Appellants further argue that fastener 1049 is a horizontal portion of bracket 1045 including a hole through which rod 1029 passes. Id. at 6. Therefore, Appellants argue that fastener 1049 lacks any element suitable for engaging a threaded opening of the barrel nut, such as a second threaded end. Id. Appellants argue that no element of fastener 1049 or bracket 1045 engages the threaded opening of a barrel nut as required by claim 1, and fastener 1049 and bracket 1045 lack the structure that is capable of engaging a threaded opening. Id.; Reply Br. 4-5. 5 Appeal 2016-001739 Application 11/631,885 For the reasons discussed above in the previous rejection, Mordue does not disclose a fastener “configured to engage” a threaded opening of a barrel nut. Instead, fastener 1049 is configured to attach to rod 1029 via an aperture through which rod 1029 extends. Mordue f 80, Fig. 19. Rod 1029 also is engaged at its upper end by nut 1041. Id. 78. We are not persuaded that the plate shape of fastener 1049 or its aperture is “configured to engage” a threaded opening in a barrel nut, as we have interpreted the term to require a structure or ability to interlock or mesh directly with a threaded opening. The Examiner’s finding that a corner of fastener 1049 could be inserted into a threaded opening and engage the threaded opening sufficient to move the barrel nut is speculative and not supported by a preponderance of evidence. Thus, we do not sustain the rejection of claims 1, 7, 9, 57, 60, 63, 66, 67, 75, and 76. DECISION We reverse the rejections of claims 1, 7, 9, 10, 12, 57, 60, 62-64, 66- 73, 75, and 76. REVERSED 6 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation