Ex Parte Haskett et alDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesMar 28, 201212194777 (B.P.A.I. Mar. 28, 2012) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte THOMAS E. HASKETT and ROBERT J. MAKI ____________ Appeal 2010-012086 Application 12/194,777 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, MARK NAGUMO, and KAREN M. HASTINGS, Administrative Patent Judges. Opinion for the Board filed by HASTINGS, Administrative Patent Judge Opinion Concurring filed by NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) of claims 1-6 and 8-18 as unpatentable over Lerner (US 5,198,292, patented Mar. 30, 1993) in view of Zillig (US 2005/0014434 A1, patented Jan. 20, 2005), and of claim 7 as unpatentable Appeal 2010-012086 Application 12/194,777 2 over these references and further in view of Elves (US 4,551,377, patented Nov. 5, 1985).1 Upon consideration of the evidence on this record and each of Appellants' contentions, we find that the preponderance of evidence on this record supports the Examiner's conclusion that the subject matter of Appellants' claims 1 and 15 is unpatentable. We sustain the above rejections based on the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and rebuttals to arguments2 expressed by the Examiner in the Answer. The decision of the Examiner is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED 1 Appellants present arguments directed to the features of independent claims 1 and 15 only (Br. 5-8). The dependent claim features have not been separately argued, including separately rejected claim 7 (id.). 2 No Reply Brief has been filed. Appeal 2010-012086 Application 12/194,777 1 NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judge, concurs in the conclusion of obviousness, and finds Appellants have not shown harmful error in the Examiner’s findings of fact or conclusions of law. kmm Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation