Ex Parte Garner et alDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesJan 26, 201211589749 (B.P.A.I. Jan. 26, 2012) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ANDREW GARNER and NEVILLE JAMES STEAD ____________ Appeal 2010-009908 Application 11/589,749 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHARLES F. WARREN, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appeal 2010-009908 Application 11/589,749 2 Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's decision rejecting claims 1-16. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6. We REVERSE. Appellants claim a fire-retardant composition comprising ammonium polyphosphate and an effective amount of a corrosion inhibiting agent which includes aluminum ions when in solution, wherein the ions complex an effective amount of fluoride ions present in the fire-retardant composition to reduce the corrosiveness of the composition (claim 1). According to Appellants' Specification, the corrosiveness of the composition is reduced by complexing and thereby reducing the level of corrosive fluoride1- ion contaminants which occur during manufacture of the composition (Spec. [0012]-[0015]). Representative claim 1 reads as follows: 1. A fire-retardant composition comprising: an ammonium polyphosphate; a suspending agent; and an effective amount of a corrosion inhibiting agent including at least one ion selected from the group of ions consisting of aluminum ions, ferric ions, calcium ions and magnesium ions, when the corrosion inhibiting agent is in solution, and wherein said ions complex an effective amount of fluoride ions present in the fire-retardant composition to reduce the corrosiveness of the fire-retardant composition. Under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a), the Examiner rejects claims 1-6 and 9-14 as unpatentable over Vandersall (US 6,620,348 B1 issued Sept. 16, 2003) in view of Kahler (US 2,848,299 issued Aug. 19, 1958) and rejects claims 1-11 Appeal 2010-009908 Application 11/589,749 3 and 13-16 as unpatentable over Sansing (US 3,809,653 issued May 7, 1974) in view of Kahler. The Examiner acknowledges that the fire-retardant compositions of Vandersall and Sansing do not contain corrosion inhibiting aluminum ions which complex fluoride ions but concludes that it would have been obvious to provide these fire-retardant compositions with the fluoride and aluminum composition of Kahler in order to obtain the benefits taught by Kahler (Ans. 3-7). We agree with Appellants that there is no motivation to include Kahler's composition in the fire-retardant compositions of Vandersall or Sansing (App. Br. 15-30, 34; Reply Br. 8-16, 20-22). The composition of Kahler is for preventing corrosion and slugging in industrial water systems (col. 1, ll. 15-16), and the benefits taught by Kahler arise in the context of such industrial water systems. As more fully explained by Appellants, these industrial water systems are dissimilar in numerous respects from the fire- retardant compositions taught by Vandersall and Sansing. The applied references provide no suggestion or reasonable expectation that the benefits of Kahler's composition would be achieved in adding this composition to the fire-retardant compositions of Vandersall or Sansing. For these reasons, we cannot sustain either of the § 103 rejections advanced by the Examiner in this appeal. The decision of the Examiner is reversed. REVERSED bar Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation