Ex Parte Boulais et alDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesSep 21, 201010219668 (B.P.A.I. Sep. 21, 2010) Copy Citation UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE United States Patent and Trademark Office Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS P.O. Box 1450 Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450 www.uspto.gov APPLICATION NO. FILING DATE FIRST NAMED INVENTOR ATTORNEY DOCKET NO. CONFIRMATION NO. 10/219,668 08/16/2002 Dennis R. Boulais 12013/46401 4884 23838 7590 09/21/2010 KENYON & KENYON LLP 1500 K STREET N.W. SUITE 700 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 EXAMINER YOUNG, MICAH PAUL ART UNIT PAPER NUMBER 1618 MAIL DATE DELIVERY MODE 09/21/2010 PAPER Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding. The time period for reply, if any, is set in the attached communication. PTOL-90A (Rev. 04/07) UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DENNIS R. BOULAIS, MARIA PALASIS, SAMUEL EPSTEIN and WENDY NAIMARK ____________ Appeal 2010-012124 Application 10/219,668 Technology Center 1600 ____________ Before STEVEN J. BARTLETT, Support Division 2 Manager. ORDER REMANDING APPEAL TO EXAMINER This application was electronically received by the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences on September 20, 2010. A Docketing Notice was mailed on September 21, 2010. Upon review of the application, it has been determined that a remand to the Examiner is necessary to consider the following issues and to take necessary corrective action. Appeal 2010-012124 Application 10/219,668 2 UNDECIDED PETITION\REPLY BRIEF NOT CONSIDERED A Petition Requesting Designation as New Ground of Rejection in Examiner’s Answer was filed on July 21, 2010. However, there is no indication in the record that the Petition was decided. In addition a Reply Brief was filed in the application on July 21, 2010. There is no evidence on the record indicating that the Examiner has considered the Reply Brief in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 41.43(a)(1) and MPEP § 1208, part II. Accordingly, it is ordered that the application is remanded to the Examiner: 1) to have the Petition filed July 21, 2010 decided; 2) to consider the Reply Brief filed July 21, 2010 as indicated above; 3) for further action as may be appropriate. If there are any questions pertaining to this Order, please contact the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences at 571-272-9797. KIS KENYON & KENYON LLP 1500 K STREET N.W. SUITE 700 WASHINGTON DC 20005 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation