Esther Leon, Complainant,v.Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 28, 2002
01A14217_r (E.E.O.C. Mar. 28, 2002)

01A14217_r

03-28-2002

Esther Leon, Complainant, v. Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Esther Leon v. Department of the Treasury

01A14217

March 28, 2002

.

Esther Leon,

Complainant,

v.

Paul H. O'Neill,

Secretary,

Department of the Treasury,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A14217

Agency No. 01-4174

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision dismissing

complainant's complaint due to untimely EEO Counselor contact is proper,

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2). In her complaint, complainant

alleged discrimination on the bases of gender (female) and national origin

(Hispanic) when she was denied the opportunity to apply for a promotion

to the position of Intelligence Research Specialist, GS-132-13. In her

letter dated April 21, 2001, complainant indicated that in June 2000,

she learned that an identified supervisor was recommending some of her

subordinates for promotion to the alleged position and inquired about the

matter to her supervisor who was not aware about such. Complainant also

indicated that in November 2000, she learned that other employees were

promoted for the alleged position and �[F]rom that moment on I attempted

to find out what this program for promotional opportunity consisted of.�

Complainant stated that she did not become aware of discrimination until

January 22, 2001, when she learned that the alleged promotion program

was on hold.

The Commission has adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed

to a "supportive facts� standard) to determine when the limitation period

is triggered under the EEOC Regulations. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(2);

Ball v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05880247 (July 6,

1988). Thus, the limitations period is not triggered until a complainant

reasonably should have suspected discrimination, but before all the facts

that would support a charge of discrimination have become apparent.

Here, the Commission finds that complainant knew or reasonably should

have suspected discrimination in November 2000, when she learned of

other employees' promotion to the alleged GS-13 level position. Thus,

the Commission finds that complainant's EEO Counselor contact with regard

to the complaint on January 31, 2001, was beyond the 45-day time limit

set by the regulations. On appeal, complainant fails to present adequate

justification to warrant an extension of the applicable time limit for

contacting an EEO Counselor. Accordingly, the agency's decision is

hereby AFFIRMED.<1>

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 28, 2002

__________________

Date

1Although the agency dismissed the complaint

on the alternative grounds of failure to state a claim, we will not

discuss such since its dismissal was affirmed due to untimely EEO

Counselor contact.