01a41975_r
11-23-2004
Eric J. Bolten, Complainant, v. Colin L. Powell, Secretary, Department of State, Agency.
Eric J. Bolten v. Department of State
01A41975
November 23, 2004
.
Eric J. Bolten,
Complainant,
v.
Colin L. Powell,
Secretary,
Department of State,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A41975
Agency No. DOS-F-018-04
DECISION
Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision dated
January 16, 2004, dismissing complainant's complaint due to untimely
EEO Counselor contact is proper pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2).
In his complaint, complainant, a former mail and file clerk in the Legal
Bureau within the agency, alleged that he was discriminated against
in June 1998, March 1999, May 2000, August 2003, and November 2003.
As relief, complainant sought to be reinstated within the agency or
other government agency.
The record indicates that in February 1996, complainant's security
clearance was placed on probationary status; in or around June 1998, he
was notified of the revocation of his security clearance; in or around
March 1999, he was formally notified of the revocation of his security
clearance, and at the same time, he was placed in a temporary position as
a mail clerk in an unclassified area without clearance; in November 1999,
he had surgery; in or around May 2000, he was forced to report back to
work but he was not able to work in the mail room due to its noise and
vibrations; on December 30, 2000, he applied for and accepted disability
retirement; in March 2003, he asked his supervisor for reinstatement,
but he was told that his position was abolished; and in response to his
letter requesting reinstatement, the agency, in a letter dated July 17,
2003, denied his reinstatement and informed him that he must apply for
regular employment with any federal agency that had vacancy announcements
for which he was qualified.
The record indicates that complainant contacted an EEO Counselor
with regard to his complaint on November 3, 2003. Upon review, the
Commission finds that complainant's EEO Counselor contact with regard
to the alleged incidents of June 1998, March 1999, and May 2000, was
beyond the 45-day time limit set by the regulations. With regard to
the incidents of August and November 2003, it appears that complainant
is alleging that he was denied his reinstatement within the agency after
his retirement. However, the record clearly indicates that complainant
was previously informed of the denial of reinstatement, verbally,
from his supervisor in March 2003, and, in writing, in July 2003.
Thus, the Commission finds that complainant's EEO Counselor contact,
with regard to the alleged reinstatement, was beyond the 45-day time
limit set by the regulations. Subsequent denials of reinstatement do
not, except in limited circumstances not presented here, state separate
claims of discrimination. The Commission will not allow a complainant
to circumvent the 45-day time limit merely by repeating a request
for reinstatement. Furthermore, complainant failed to show that he
contacted an EEO Counselor or the EEO Office with the intent to pursue
the EEO process prior to November 3, 2003.
Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss the complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
November 23, 2004
__________________
Date