0120131222
06-14-2013
Emma J. Hudson,
Complainant,
v.
John M. McHugh,
Secretary,
Department of the Army,
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120131222
Agency No. ARRRAD12SEP03889
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's final decision dated January 17, 2013, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.
BACKGROUND
During the period at issue, Complainant worked as a Maintenance Management Specialist at the Agency's Directorate for Logistics, USA Tacom, Red River Army Depot in Texarkana, Texas.
On January 2, 2013, Complainant filed the instant formal complaint. Therein, Complainant alleged that she was subjected to harassment and a hostile work environment on the basis of race when:
1. on September 18, 2012, the Director of Logistics (Director), also her second level supervisor, stared at her and a co-worker at a four way intersection while en route to her office;
2. on September 6, 2012, the Director directed her immediate supervisor to charge her twelve minutes unauthorized absence for leaving the depot early prior to lunch; and
3. on September 5, 2012, the Director spoke to her in a very hostile tone of voice during a telephone conversation between the Director and Complainant, regarding increasing funding to use in the Self Serving store.
The Agency dismissed claims 1 - 3 pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim. Specifically, in addressing these claims, the Agency found that unless the conduct is severe, a single incident or group of isolated incidents will not state a claim of discriminatory harassment.
The record contains a copy of Complainant's formal complaint. Therein, Complainant stated that in regard to claim 2, that on September 6, 2012, she was on leave when the Director instructed her supervisor and "tried to make her charge me AWOL when I was on leave 12 minutes + she called said I left 6 min early for lunch when my boss told her I was on leave." The record also contains the EEO Counselor's Report in which the EEO Counselor stated that Complainant had previously requested and was approved for twelve minutes leave for September 6, 2012.
The instant appeal followed.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1) provides for the dismissal of a complaint which fails to state a claim within the meaning of 29 C.F.R. �1614.103. In order to establish standing initially under 29 C.F.R. �1614.103, a complainant must be either an employee or an applicant for employment of the agency against which the allegations of discrimination are raised. In addition, the claims must concern an employment policy or practice which affects the individual in his or her capacity as an employee or applicant for employment. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �1614.103; �1614.106(a). The Commission's Federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).
The Commission determines that the three subject claims do not address a personal loss or harm to a term, condition, or privilege of Complainant's employment. Moreover, even if proven to be true and viewed in a light most favorable to Complainant, these claims would not indicate that she has been subjected to harassment that was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of employment. See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March 13, 1997).
Finally, we note that Complainant, on appeal, raises new claims that management handled her discipline issues publicly which caused her embarrassment and emotional stress. This new matter was not previously raised by Complainant and it is inappropriate for Complainant to raise it for the first time on appeal. Complainant is advised that if she wishes to pursue any additional claims for the first time on appeal, she should initiate contact with an EEO Counselor.
The Agency final decision dismissing the instant formal complaint for failure to state a claim is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
June 14, 2013
__________________
Date
2
0120131222
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120131222
5
0120131222