Edmund G. Mitchell, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 18, 2008
0120081029 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 18, 2008)

0120081029

03-18-2008

Edmund G. Mitchell, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Edmund G. Mitchell,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120081029

Agency No. 1J608000707

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated December 17, 2007, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.,

Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as

amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. Upon review,

the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was properly dismissed

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim.

In a complaint dated December 4, 2007, complainant alleged that he

was subjected to hostile workplace discrimination on the bases of age

(58), sex (Male, Sexual Orientation)1 and disability (Hypertension,

Stress) when: on July 15, 2007, his supervisor told him that he was

a sissy and everyone in the Post Office knows that he is a sissy; on

August 31, 2 007, his supervisor yelled at him and tried to keep him

from working overtime; on September 5, 2007, he was paged to return to

his unit after being in the washroom for only eight minutes, asked to

bring in a doctor's statement because he asked to go to the washroom,

and he was paged again by his supervisor; and on September 6, 2007, his

supervisor paged him to return to his assignment while he was on lunch,

and later he was not released for break until 3:10 am.

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the

EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that he suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Moreover, we also find that

the events described do not indicate that complainant has been subjected

to harassment that was sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the

conditions of his employment. See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury,

Request No. 05970077 (March 13, 1997). Accordingly, the agency's final

decision dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 18, 2008

__________________

Date

1 The Commission notes that Sexual Orientation is not a basis which

comes under its purview.

??

??

??

??

2

0120081029

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120081029