DROR et al.v.ROWEDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesFeb 26, 199807865781 (B.P.A.I. Feb. 26, 1998) Copy Citation Patent No. 5,102,402, granted April 7, 1992, based1 on 07/637,436, filed January 4, 1991. Assignor to Medtronic, Inc., a Corp. of MN. Application 07/865,781, filed April 7, 1992. 2 Accorded benefit of Application 07/322,929, filed March 14, 1989. Assignor to Cordis Corporation, A corp. of FL. THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 34 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ MICHAEL DROR and PAUL TRESCONY Junior Party1 V. STANTON J. ROWE Senior Party2 ____________ Interference No. 103,157 ____________ JUDGMENT ____________ Before METZ, MARTIN, and PATE, Administrative Patent Judges. PATE, Administrative Patent Judge. On October 29, 1997 the Administrative Patent Judge ordered the junior party to show cause why judgment should not be entered against them on the ground of failure to file a preliminary Interference No. 103,157 statement. The junior party has not filed a response to the order. Accordingly, the following judgment is entered. Judgment Judgment in Interference No. 103,157 is hereby entered against Michael Dror and Paul Trescony, the junior party. Michael Dror and Paul Trescony are not entitled to their patent containing claims 1 through 8, 10 through 15, and 17 through 21, which claims correspond to the count in interference. Judgment is entered in favor of Stanton J. Rowe, the senior party. Stanton J. Rowe is entitled to a patent containing claims 53 through 56, which claims correspond to the count in interference. ANDREW H. METZ ) Administrative Patent Judge) ) ) ) WILLIAM F. PATE, III ) BOARD OF PATENT Administrative Patent Judge) APPEALS ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) JOHN C. MARTIN ) Administrative Patent Judge) -2- Interference No. 103,157 Attorney for Dror et al.: Daniel W. Latham et al. Medtronic, Inc. 7000 Central Ave., N.E. Minneapolis, MN 55432 Attorney for Rowe: Garrettson Ellis et al. Gerstman & Ellis, Ltd. 2 N. LaSalle St. Ste. 2010 Chicago, Ill 60602 -3- Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation