05A40131
12-29-2003
Douglas Baldwin v. Department of the Interior
05A40131
December 29, 2003
.
Douglas Baldwin,
Complainant,
v.
Gale A. Norton,
Secretary,
Department of the Interior,
(Bureau of Indian Affairs),
Agency.
Request No. 05A40131
Appeal No. 01A21546
Agency No. BIA-01-035
DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Douglas Baldwin (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the
decision in Douglas Baldwin v. Department of the Interior, EEOC Appeal
No. 01A21546 (September 23, 2003). EEOC Regulations provide that the
Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission
decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate
decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact
or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on
the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �
1614.405(b).
In the underlying complaint, complainant contended that he was
discriminated against on the basis of race (Caucasian) when he was
originally selected for the vacant Criminal Investigator position in
March 2000, but later the position was given to a candidate who was
American Indian in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.
On December 18, 2001, the agency issued its final decision finding no
discrimination and our prior appellate decision affirmed this finding.
In his request for reconsideration, complainant essentially repeats
the arguments presented on appeal and contends that, insofar as the
Commission's prior decision found such arguments to be unpersuasive, the
prior decision contained clearly erroneous interpretations of fact and
law. In response, the agency argues that complainant has not submitted
any evidence or argument to support his request for reconsideration.
After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the previous
decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request
fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the
decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC
Appeal No. 01A21546 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no
further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission
on this request for reconsideration.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right
of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the
right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District
Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this
decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in
the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
December 29, 2003
__________________
Date