Dorothy M. Barr, Complainant,v.John M. McHugh, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 23, 2011
0120112274 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 23, 2011)

0120112274

08-23-2011

Dorothy M. Barr, Complainant, v. John M. McHugh, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.




Dorothy M. Barr,

Complainant,

v.

John M. McHugh,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120112274

Agency No. ARMEADE10OCT04550

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated March 2, 2011, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Transportation Inspector at the Agency’s Transportation Office

facility in Fort Meade, Maryland.

On November 8, 2010, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that

the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the basis of reprisal

for prior protected EEO activity under Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 when:

1. on December 19, 2008, her supervisor told her that she should not

enter the supervisor’s office and that she (the supervisor) was sick

of seeing her;

2. on February 3, 2009, she received an inflammatory email from the

supervisor

3. on February 3, 2009 – March 4, 2010 Complainant experienced a great

deal of hostility at the hand of the supervisor in an attempt to defame

or inflict mental emotional stress on Complainant;

4. on March 10, 2010, Complainant was abruptly bumped into by the

supervisor in a deliberate attempt to intimidate and inflict bodily harm

upon Complainant.

The record indicates that Complainant initially had contact with the EEO

office in March 2010, and received a right to file her formal complaint

on April 8, 2010. Complainant again contacted the EEO office on October

6, 2010. She filed a formal complaint on the above issues on November

5, 2010.

The Agency dismissed claims 1 and 2 because they were raised in an earlier

complaint. The Agency also dismissed claims 3 and 4 as untimely raised

with the EEO counselor.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. § 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of

discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment

Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the

matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel

action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

The Commission has adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed

to a "supportive facts" standard) to determine when the forty-five (45)

day limitation period is triggered. See Howard v. Dep’t of the Navy,

EEOC Request No. 05970852 (Feb. 11, 1999). Thus, the time limitation is

not triggered until a complainant reasonably suspects discrimination,

but before all the facts that support a charge of discrimination have

become apparent.

In the instant case, to the extent that Complainant raised all four

claims with the counselor in October 2010, those claims were beyond the

45-day limitation period and thus untimely raised. To the extent that

Complainant raised claims 1 and 2 with the EEO counselor in March 2010,

she did not timely filed a formal complaint on those claims within 15

days of her receipt of the April 8, 2010 notice of right to file. On

appeal, Complainant has not offered adequate justification to warrant

an extension of the time limit for filing the complaint.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File A Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 23, 2011

__________________

Date

2

0120112274

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120112274