Donna F. Dunn, Complainant,v.Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 25, 2002
01A04523_r (E.E.O.C. Apr. 25, 2002)

01A04523_r

04-25-2002

Donna F. Dunn, Complainant, v. Paul H. O'Neill, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Donna F. Dunn v. Department of the Treasury

01A04523

April 25, 2002

.

Donna F. Dunn,

Complainant,

v.

Paul H. O'Neill,

Secretary,

Department of the Treasury,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A04523

Agency Nos. 00-3113, 000017B

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission to determine

whether the agency is in compliance with the terms of the February 7,

1995 settlement agreement into which the parties entered.

The settlement agreement provided, in pertinent part, that:

(1) The agency will:

Reassign complainant to a permanent position series/grade 0592/6,

position description #06145 at the Gateway Center. The reassignment

will be effective no later than pay period beginning March 5, 1995.

Reassignment is for the purpose of providing reasonable accommodations

for her medical condition: allergies to dust, paper mites, carpets,

mold, and mildew.

Allow complainant to apply for disability retirement if she is still

unable to work in the area stated in A. above after a 90 day trial

period.

In September 1999, an internal audit of the agency's official personnel

files resulted in a notice being sent to complainant that her service

computation date (SCD) would be adjusted by subtracting time during which

complainant was in nonwork (or furlough) status. By letter to the agency

dated November 20, 1999, complainant alleged that the agency was in breach

of the settlement agreement, and requested that the agency specifically

implement its terms. Specifically, complainant alleged that the agency

failed to keep complainant's SCD as intended by the parties at the time

the settlement agreement was executed.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504(a) provides that any settlement

agreement knowingly and voluntarily agreed to by the parties, reached at

any stage of the complaint process, shall be binding on both parties.

In the instant case, we note that nothing in the settlement agreement

provides for maintenance of complainant's SCD as if she had received

permanent status prior to 1995. We therefore concur with the agency that

complainant has failed to show that the agency breached the settlement

agreement.

The Commission notes that complainant initially presented the instant

matter as a claim that the agency had, post-agreement, retaliated

against her. Complainant was therefore directed to EEO counseling which

resulted in the assignment of the second agency case number, 00-3113.

It is not clear, however, if complainant still wishes to pursue the

matter of alleged retaliation as a separate complaint of discrimination

under � 1614.106. If complainant wishes to pursue her reprisal claim,

then she should inform the agency's EEO office of her desire to do so

within 15 days of the date this decision becomes final.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the agency's final decision finding that no breach

of the settlement agreement occurred.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which

to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

April 25, 2002

__________________

Date