Donald A. DeLawter, Petitioner,v.Dr. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 13, 2005
03a60021 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 13, 2005)

03a60021

12-13-2005

Donald A. DeLawter, Petitioner, v. Dr. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Donald A. DeLawter v. Dept. Of the Army

03A60021

December 13, 2005

.

Donald A. DeLawter,

Petitioner,

v.

Dr. Francis J. Harvey,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Petition No. 03A60021

MSPB No. DC-0752-04-0615-I-1

DECISION

Petitioner filed a timely petition with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission asking for review of a Final Order issued by the Merit

Systems Protection Board (MSPB) concerning his claim of discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Petitioner, a WG-5703-7 Motor Vehicle Operator, alleged he was

discriminated against on the basis of race (Caucasian) when he was

removed from his position. The record indicates that petitioner tested

positive for marijuana (a controlled substance) following a random drug

test. Petitioner filed an appeal with the MSPB challenging his removal.

Following a hearing, the MSPB Administrative Judge (AJ) found that the

agency met its burden of proof related to the positive test result. The AJ

did not find petitioner's assertions regarding the collection of the urine

sample and his argument that he had ingested marijuana by accident by

eating brownies laced with the substance to be credible. The AJ further

found that petitioner was not able to identify anyone similarly situated

to him who was treated differently. The record indicates that six other

employees, who were not Caucasian, were also removed for failing their

drug test. Petitioner sought review by the full Board, but the Board

denied petitioner's petition for review. Thereafter petitioner filed the

instant petition with the Commission, making many of the same arguments

he had already made before the MSPB.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over

mixed case appeals on which the MSPB has issued a decision that makes

determinations on allegations of discrimination. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.303

et seq. The Commission must determine whether the decision of the

MSPB with respect to the allegation of discrimination constitutes a

correct interpretation of any applicable law, rule, regulation or policy

directive, and is supported by the evidence in the record as a whole.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(c).

Based upon a thorough review of the record and for the foregoing reasons,

it is the decision of the Commission to concur with the final decision

of the MSPB finding no discrimination. The Commission finds that the

MSPB's decision constitutes a correct interpretation of the laws, rules,

regulations, and policies governing this matter and is supported by the

evidence in the record as a whole.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 13, 2005

__________________

Date