Dolores L. Reyes, Complainant,v.R. James Nicholson, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMar 13, 2008
0120080831 (E.E.O.C. Mar. 13, 2008)

0120080831

03-13-2008

Dolores L. Reyes, Complainant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Dolores L. Reyes,

Complainant,

v.

R. James Nicholson,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120080831

Agency No. 2003-0756-2007103873

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated November 1, 2007, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

improperly dismissed, in part, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)

for failure to state a claim.

On August 24, 2007, complainant initiated contact with an Equal

Employment Opportunity (EEO) Counselor alleging that the agency

subjected her to hostile work environment harassment on the basis of

sex (female) when (1) in April 2007, a Supervisory Radiologist (S1)

stated that no internal applicants would be accepted for a Supervisory

Diagnostic Radiologic Technologist vacancy, which caused complainant

not to apply and (2) on July 17, 2007, S1 stated to complainant that he

did not want a female for the supervisory vacancy and stated the same

to one of complainant's coworkers. Subsequently, complainant filed a

formal complaint reiterating (1) and (2) and adding that (3) on July

24, 2007, S1 condoned the actions of a male coworker who refused to

assist complainant with a wheelchair-bound patient and slammed a door in

her face. Finally, complainant amended her formal complaint to allege

that the agency continued to harass her, based on reprisal, when (4)

on October 3, 2007, a supervisor approached her in a very aggressive

manner in front of a patient, and instructed her to meet with a coworker

and bring a union representative with her.

In its November 1 final decision, the agency dismissed incidents (2) and

(4) pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim,

and incident (1) pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) for untimely

EEO contact.

Regarding (1) and (2), we find that a fair reading of the two together

is a claim of "discriminatory nonselection" when S1 manipulated the

selection process for the supervisory position based on his desire to

hire a male and not a female. Generally, we have found that a claim of

discriminatory nonselection fails to state a claim when complainant fails

to apply for the position.1 However, after careful consideration of the

claim and record presented, we are persuaded that the matter states a

claim that complainant was denied an opportunity to apply based on S1's

discriminatory motives. However, as to incidents (3) and (4), we find

that complainant failed to allege a present harm or loss with respect

to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a

remedy2; or allege actions sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the

conditions of complainant's employment3 or of a type reasonably likely

to deter complainant or others from engaging in protected activity.

Based on the above, we REVERSE the final agency decision as to (1)

and (2) and AFFIRM the decision as to (3) and (4). We remand a claim

of discriminatory nonselection to the agency for further processing

consistent with this decision and the Order below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision/action in part, but it

also requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your

time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil

action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph

above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

March 13, 2008

__________________

Date

1 See Owen v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Request No. 05950865

(December 11, 1997).

2 Diaz v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21,

1994).

3 See Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 23 (1993).

??

??

??

??

2

0120080831

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

5

0120080831