David R. Brown, Complainant,v.Michael W. Wynne, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 1, 2008
0120081745 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 1, 2008)

0120081745

08-01-2008

David R. Brown, Complainant, v. Michael W. Wynne, Secretary, Department of the Air Force, Agency.


David R. Brown,

Complainant,

v.

Michael W. Wynne,

Secretary,

Department of the Air Force,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120081745

Agency No. 9V1M06232

DECISION

On February 27, 2008, complainant filed an appeal from the agency's

February 27, 2008 final decision, concerning his equal employment

opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment discrimination in

violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII),

as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. The appeal is deemed timely and

is accepted pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(a).

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, complainant worked

as a Pneudraulic Systems Mechanic at an Oklahoma facility of the agency.

In June 2006, complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that the agency

subjected him to hostile work environment harassment on the bases of color

(Black) and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity when (1) between

September 20, 2005 and December 14, 2005, there were five annotations in

his "971" for late arrival to work, (2) from January 2006 to April 2006,

he was denied the opportunity for reassignment to a limited duty job

while he recovered from an injury, (3) on March 17, 2006, he received

a written counseling for excessive sick leave usage, (4) on June 9,

2006, he was denied leave and charged as absent without leave; and (5)

on June 12, 2006, he was temporarily moved to another building.

During an agency investigation, complainant's first level supervisor

(S1) stated: regarding (1) and (3), complainant used excessive sick

leave (accrued 52 hours of sick leave within a six month period and

used 160.25 hours) although he was verbally counseled about the matter

and never documented a chronic illness; and, as to (4), he did not trust

complainant's need to be late because, toward the beginning of his shift,

complainant called twice within five minutes with two different reasons

for his lateness and then arrived seven hours late. As to (2), the agency

stated that complainant wanted a limited duty position answering phones,

but that position was given to a coworker who could not sit or stand

for long periods of time and complainant was given a bench position

within his temporary medical restrictions. (Specifically, the agency

stated that S1 would take work to complainant to perform at his bench.)

Regarding (5), complainant's second level supervisor (S2) stated he

moved complainant because S1 and complainant made threat allegations

against each other and neither could be verified so complainant was

sent to work with another supervisor in another building temporarily.

S2 stated that complainant's relocation continued after a coworker made

allegations of inappropriate behavior against complainant.

Following its investigation, the agency informed complainant of his

right to request a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ).

When complainant did not request a hearing within the statutory time

frame, the agency issued a final decision. In its final decision,

the agency found that complainant failed to establish a hostile work

environment or that the agency's actions were based on discriminatory

factors.

Based on a thorough review of the record and the contentions on

appeal, including those not specifically addressed herein, we AFFIRM

the final agency decision. We agree that complainant failed to

show that the agency's actions were based on impermissible motives.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0408)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0408)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your

time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil

action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph

above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 1, 2008

__________________

Date

2

0120063400

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

4

0120081745

5

0120081745