Daniel C. Russo, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 8, 1999
01986781 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 8, 1999)

01986781

04-08-1999

Daniel C. Russo, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Daniel C. Russo v. United States Postal Service

01986781

April 8, 1999

Daniel C. Russo, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01986781

) Agency No. 1-C-191-0072-98

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

_________________________________)

DECISION

Appellant filed the instant appeal from the agency's decision dated August

6, 1998 dismissing appellant's complaint on the grounds that appellant

failed to raise the matter with an EEO Counselor. The agency defined

appellant's complaint as alleging that appellant was discriminated

against when:

On November 4, 1997 appellant received a letter from the former Manager,

Human Resources, Allegheny Area in answer to a formal complaint.

As late as February 13, 1998 appellant received correspondence from the

officials involved saying the complaint he made is considered closed.

The agency found, and the EEO Counselor's report shows, that appellant

requested counseling regarding the following issue: In March 1996

another employee was promoted into appellant's position as Manager,

Maintenance. In the EEO complaint appellant did reference the incidents

in allegations 1 and 2, but also stated that the agency treated Employee

A differently than appellant "when it came to storing unauthorized files

on his computer." The EEO Counselor's report states:

[Appellant] stated that this employee was promoted as Manager, Maintenance

when he performed the same acts (sexual in nature) on his computer as

he did. However, he was demoted and the other employee was promoted.

A letter dated February 13, 1998 from A/Manager, Human Resources to

appellant concerns "an adverse action in the form of a reduction in

grade as a result of [appellant's] misconduct."

The Commission finds that appellant may have attempted to raise in

his complaint the allegation he raised with the EEO Counselor - in

March 1996 another employee was promoted into appellant's position.

The incidents cited in allegations 1 and 2 may be background information

only. Alternatively, appellant may indeed be attempting to raise only

allegations 1 and 2 as defined by the agency.

The Commission shall remand the matter so that the agency may contact

appellant to clarify the complaint. If the agency determines that the

redefined complaint may be dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107,

then it may issue a decision dismissing the redefined complaint.

The agency's decision dismissing the complaint is VACATED and we REMAND

the complaint to the agency for further processing in accordance with

this decision and applicable regulations.

ORDER

The agency shall contact appellant to clarify the complaint and the agency

shall redefine the complaint to reflect the understanding of the complaint

by the parties. Within 60 days of the date this decision becomes final

the agency shall issue a letter to appellant accepting the complaint for

investigation or issue a new decision dismissing the complaint. A copy

of the letter accepting the complaint or new decision dismissing the

complaint must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced herein.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to

File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil

action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is

subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16� (Supp. V 1993).

If the appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of

the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0993)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court. It is the position of the Commission that you

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. You should be aware, however, that courts in some

jurisdictions have interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner

suggesting that a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS from the date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your

civil action is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN

THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision

or to consult an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the

jurisdiction in which your action would be filed. In the alternative,

you may file a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR

DAYS of the date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your

appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME

AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY

HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

April 8, 1999

DATE Ronnie Blumenthal, Director

Office of Federal Operations