0120083567
04-22-2010
Daniel Bediako, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Capital Metro Area), Agency.
Daniel Bediako,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
(Capital Metro Area),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120083567
Agency No. 4K200010708
DECISION
Complainant, a Letter Carrier at the agency's Post Office, in Bethesda,
Maryland, filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's
decision dated July 24, 2008, dismissing his complaint of unlawful
employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.
In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to
discrimination on the bases of race (Black) national origin (Ghana), color
(black), and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity under Title VII,
when:
(1) on January 27, 2007, management would not confirm his employment,
(2) in April 2007, management informed him that he would not be permitted
to work while his license was suspended, and
(3) on April 3, 2008, he received notification that he was placed on a
Last Chance Agreement (LCA) as a condition of employment.
In its dismissal decision, the agency found that complainant failed to
contact an EEO counselor within 45 days of the incidents alleged to be
discriminatory in issues (1) and (2). Specifically, the agency found that
evidence of record indicates that complainant did not contact a Counselor
until March 28, 2008, which was 426 days, approximately (14 months) after
the first incident cited on January 27, 2007, and 333 days, approximately
(11 months) after the second incident cited on April 30, 2007.
As to issue (3), the dismissal decision found that there is no evidence
in the record to show that complainant has been subjected to any
adverse action as a result of the actions at issue, and therefore,
issue (3) was dismissed as failing to state a claim in accordance with
On appeal, complainant contends that the complaint was improperly
dismissed, noting that the LCA presented a tangible loss to him.
Complainant also asserts that the three incidents are examples of
harassment, that should be considered jointly, and that the harassment
was certainly severe or pervasive enough to be unlawful. The agency
disagrees and asks the Commission to affirm its Dismissal decision.
To establish a claim of harassment a complainant must show that: (1)
they belong to a statutorily protected class; (2) they were subjected to
harassment in the form of unwelcome verbal or physical conduct involving
the protected class; (3) the harassment complained of was based on
their statutorily protected class; (4) the harassment affected a term or
condition of employment and/or had the purpose or effect of unreasonably
interfering with the work environment and/or creating an intimidating,
hostile, or offensive work environment; and (5) there is a basis for
imputing liability to the employer. See Henson v. City of Dundee, 682 F.2d
897 (11th Cir. 1982). Further, the incidents must have been "sufficiently
severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of [complainant's] employment
and create an abusive working environment." Harris v. Forklift Systems,
Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993). The harasser's conduct should be evaluated
from the objective viewpoint of a reasonable person in the victim's
circumstances. Enforcement Guidance on Harris v. Forklift Systems Inc.,
EEOC Notice No. 915.002 at 6 (March 8, 1994).
Here, based on a fair reading of the complaint, the Commission finds that
complainant has alleged that the incidents in issues (1), (2) and (3),
taken together, constitute a single claim of hostile work environment.
As the first incident allegedly resulted in a delay in complainant's
being released from prison to a halfway house, the alleged harassment
is certainly severe or pervasive enough to state a claim of actionable
harassment. Additionally, applying National Railroad Passenger
Corporation v. Morgan, 122 S.Ct. 2061 (June 10, 2002), complainant's
entire harassment claim was timely because issue (3) occurred within
the 45 days of complainant's EEO counselor contact.
Complainant has shown an injury or harm to a term, condition, or privilege
of employment for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Department of the
Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Accordingly, the
agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is reversed.
The complaint is hereby remanded to the agency for further processing
in accordance with this decision and the Order below.
ORDER (E0408)
The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with
29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant
that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar
days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue
to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify
complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)
calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter
is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a
final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision
within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1208)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar
days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall
be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations,
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington,
DC 20013. The agency's report must contain supporting documentation,
and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the complainant.
If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the complainant
may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �
1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a civil action
to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following
an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407,
1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant
has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in
accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil
Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for
enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject
to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999).
If the complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of
the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M1208)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,
Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request
to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail
within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0408)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date
that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant
in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that
the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also
permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other
security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,
42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,
29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within
the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with
the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.
Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time
limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
____4/22/10______________
Date
2
0120083567
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120083567