05a00018
02-28-2000
Dale F. Putman, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Dale F. Putman v. United States Postal Service
05A00018
February 28, 2000
Dale F. Putman, )
Complainant, )
)
v. ) Request No. 05A00018
) Appeal No. 01975852
William J. Henderson, ) Agency No. 4-J-493-1015-96
Postmaster General, )
United States Postal Service, )
Agency. )
)
DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION <1>
The complainant timely initiated a request to the Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission (Commission) to reconsider the decision in Dale
F. Putman v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01975852
(August 24, 1999). EEOC regulations provide that the Commission
may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous decision.<2> 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.405(b)). The party requesting
reconsideration must submit written argument or evidence which tends
to establish one or more of the following two criteria: the appellate
decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact
or law; or the decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices or operations of the agency.
After a review of the request for reconsideration, the previous decision,
and the entire record, the Commission finds that the complainant's
request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. �1614.405(b), and it
is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision
in EEOC Appeal No. 01975852 (August 24, 1999) remains the Commission's
final decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal from
a decision of the Commission on this request for reconsideration.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P1199)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right
of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the
right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District
Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive
this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT
IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
February 28, 2000
_______________ ______________________________
Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that
the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative
(if applicable), and the agency on:
DATE Equal Employment Assistant
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
Federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present request. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.
2The complainant received the appellate decision on August 31, 1999.
His request was received on October 1, 1999 in an envelope that lacked a
legible postmark. Because the request was received within five calendar
days of the date it was due, September 30, 1999, the Commission deems
the request timely pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)
(to be codified at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(b)).