Curtis L. Burns, Petitioner,v.Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 3, 2005
0420050001_Burns (E.E.O.C. Oct. 3, 2005)

0420050001_Burns

10-03-2005

Curtis L. Burns, Petitioner, v. Michael Chertoff, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Agency.


Reference #: 0420050001

Daniel Southerland, Director

Office of Civil Rights & Civil Liberties

Department of Homeland Security

Washington, DC 20528

Reference #: 0420050001

Curtis L. Burns

11800 James Drive

Balch Springs, TX 75180

Reference #: 0420050001

Mark J. Berkowitz,

Esq.

524 S. Andrews

Avenue

Suite 200N

Ft. Lauderdale,

FL 33301

Reference #: 0420050001

Judy Maltby, Chief

EEO Complaints Program Management Office

Department of Homeland Security

Bishop Henry Whipple Federal Building

One Federal Drive, Room G-56C

Twin Cities, MN 55111-4007

Curtis L. Burns,

Petitioner,

v.

Michael Chertoff,

Secretary,

Department of Homeland Security,

Agency.

Petition No. 0420050001

Appeal No. 01972934

Agency No. I946510

DECISION ON A PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT

On September 28, 2004, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

(EEOC or Commission) docketed a petition for enforcement to examine the

enforcement of an order set forth in Curtis L. Burns v. Department of

Homeland Security, Appeal No. 01972934 (January 19, 2001). This petition

for enforcement is accepted by the Commission pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503. Petitioner has alleged that the agency failed to fully comply

with the Commission's order as set forth below.

Petitioner filed a complaint in which he alleged that the agency

discriminated against him on the bases of race (African-American) and

disability (right wrist tenosynovitis) in violation of Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et

seq. and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation

Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. Petitioner appealed the

agency's final decision to the Commission, and in Appeal No. 01972934,

the Commission found that the agency had violated the Rehabilitation

Act when it improperly denied complainant a reasonable accommodation

for his disability.

The Commission ordered the agency to afford complainant several forms of

relief for the discrimination including ordering the agency to determine

the amount of compensatory damages to which complainant was entitled.

The matter was assigned to a Compliance Officer and docketed as Compliance

No. 06A10578 on January 23, 2001.

On September 28, 2004, the Commission dockedted the petition for

enforcement at issue. Petitioner contends that the agency has failed to

make any determination with respect to his entitlement to compensatory

damages.

The agency has not responded to complainant's petition for enforcement.

The compliance record before us indicates that complainant submitted

information to the agency concerning his entitlement to compensatory

damages but is devoid of any indication that the agency made the

compensatory damages determination as we ordered it to do. Accordingly,

the petition for enforcement is GRANTED as the record does not demonstrate

that the agency has complied with our order as repeated, in part, below.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to take the following remedial action:

(A) The agency shall conduct a supplemental investigation pertaining to

complainant's entitlement to compensatory damages incurred as result of

the agency's discriminatory actions. See Teshima v. United States Postal

Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01961997 (May 5, 1998); Feris v. Environmental

Protection Agency, EEOC Appeal No. 011934828 (August 10, 1995), request

to reopen denied, EEOC Request No. 05950936 (July 19, 1996); Rivera

v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 01934157 (July 22, 1994);

Carle v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 01922369 (January 5,

1993). See also, Cobey Turner v. Department of the Interior, EEOC Appeal

Nos. 01956390 and 01960518 (April 27, 1998); Jackson v. United States

Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01923399 (November 12, 1992), request for

reconsideration denied, EEOC Request No. 05930306 (February 1, 1993). The

agency shall afford complainant sixty (60) days to submit additional

evidence in support of his claim for compensatory damages. Within thirty

(30) days of its receipt of complainant's evidence, the agency shall issue

a final decision determining complainant's entitlement to compensatory

damages, together with appropriate appeal rights.

(B) The agency is further directed to submit a report of compliance, as

provided in the statement entitled "Implementation of the Commission's

Decision."

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your

time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil

action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph

above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

__________________

Date

04 Case Code Sheet - INTERNAL CIRCULATION ONLY

Initials Date TO: Carlton M. Hadden, Director, Office of

Federal Operations Hilda Rodriguez, Director, Appellate

Review Programs FROM: Neal Thomas, Attorney Shelley

Kahn, Supervisor Melissa Miller, Division Director

Petition Number(s) 0420050001 Appeal Number(s) Agency Number(s)

I946510 Hearing Number(s) Petitioner(s): Curtis L. Burns Agency: DHS

Decision: Granted Statute(s) Alleged Title VII and Rehab Act Basis(es)

Alleged HP - Disability/Physical and RB - Race/Black Issue(s) Alleged A5,

reassignment (Where Discrimination Is

Found Only): (A) Basis(es) For Finding: (B) Issues In Finding HP A5,

reassignment

(Check All Applicable Codes) Merits Decision Codes X 4A - Merits

decision

? 7P - Clarification decision (the decision

Clarifies the remedy only)

X 7Q - Decision directs agency to conduct

Investigation and submit supplementary

report to OFO

? 7R - Decision directs complainant to provide

Additional information ? 7L - Compliance terminated

(the decision has

Determined that the agency's actions are

in compliance with the prior decision. No

further action is required)

X 4Q - Compliance required

Revised 10/3/05

ARP Companion Case Checklist

Complainant Agency Appeal/Request/Petition No. Curtis L. Burns DHS

0420050001

OPEN CASES

Appeal No. ORADS Status Related (Yes/No) Actions Taken 0

CLOSED CASES

Appeal No. ORADS Status Related (Yes/No) Actions Taken 0 01972934 y

Same case

April 23, 2008

Attorney Date

2

0420050001

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

4

0420050001

5

0420050001