Criss Bros., Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Nov 19, 2001

336 N.L.R.B. 107 (N.L.R.B. 2001)

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Ex-
ecutive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C.
20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can
be included in the bound volumes.
Criss Bros., Inc. and International Association of
Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and Reinforcing
Iron Workers, Shopmen’s Local Union No. 486,
AFL–CIO. Case 5–CA–29480
November 19, 2001
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN HURTGEN AND MEMBERS LIEBMAN
AND WALSH
Upon a charge and amended charge filed by Interna-
tional Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental and
Reinforcing Iron Workers, Shopmen’s Local Union No.
486, AFL–CIO (the Union) on January 31 and March 9,
2001, the General Counsel of the National Labor Rela-
tions Board issued a complaint on May 31, 2001, against
Criss Bros., Inc., the Respondent, alleging that it has vio-
lated Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor Rela-
tions Act. Although properly served copies of the charge,
amended charge, and complaint, the Respondent failed to
file an answer.
On September 20, 2001, the General Counsel filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment with the Board. On Sep-
tember 25, 2001, the Board issued an order transferring
the proceeding to the Board and a Notice to Show Cause
why the motion should not be granted. The Respondent
filed no response. The allegations in the motion are
therefore undisputed.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
Sections 102.20 and 102.21 of the Board’s Rules and
Regulations provide that the allegations in the complaint
shall be deemed admitted if an answer is not filed within
14 days from service of the complaint, unless good cause
is shown. In addition, the complaint affirmatively notes
that unless an answer is filed within 14 days of service,
all the allegations in the complaint will be considered
admitted. Further, the undisputed allegations in the Mo-
tion for Summary Judgment disclose that the Region, by
letter dated August 7, 2001, notified the Respondent that
unless an answer was received by August 21, 2001, a
Motion for Summary Judgment would be filed.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the fail-
ure to file a timely answer, we grant the General Coun-
sel’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a Maryland cor-
poration with an office and place of business in Bladens-
burg, Maryland, has been engaged in the fabrication of
iron, structural steel, and metal products. During the 12–
month period preceding issuance of the complaint, the
Respondent, in conducting its business operations de-
scribed above, purchased and received at its Bladens-
burg, Maryland facility goods valued in excess of
$50,000 directly from points outside the State of Mary-
land. We find that the Respondent is an employer en-
gaged in commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2),
(6), and (7) of the Act and that the Union is a labor or-
ganization within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
The following employees of the Respondent (the unit)
constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collec-
tive bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the
Act:
All production and maintenance employees of the
Company engaged in the fabrication of iron, steel, and
metal products, or in maintenance work in or about the
Company’s plant or plants located at Bladensburg,
Maryland, and vicinity. Excluding office or clerical
employees, draftsmen, engineering employees, watch-
men, employees engaged in erection, installation or
construction work, and guards and supervisors as de-
fined by the Act.
Since in or around 1948, and at all material times, the
Union has been the designated exclusive collective–
bargaining representative of the unit and, since then, the
Union has been recognized as the representative by the
Respondent. This recognition has been embodied in suc-
cessive collective–bargaining agreements, the most re-
cent of which was effective from April 1, 2000 to March
31, 2001 (the 2000 Agreement).
At all times since 1948, based on Section 9(a) of the
Act, the Union has been the exclusive collective–
bargaining representative of the unit.
Section 5 of the 2000 Agreement required that the Re-
spondent deduct dues and fees from unit employees’
earnings and mail to the Union a check made payable to
the Union for the amount of dues and fees the Respon-
dent has withheld.
After the March 31, 2001 expiration of the 2000
Agreement, and all material times thereafter, the Re-
spondent has continued to deduct dues and fees from unit
employees’ earnings.
Since about July 1, 2000, the Respondent has failed
and refused to remit union dues and fees to the Union.
On or about September 19, 2000, the Union filed a
grievance alleging that, under section 14(j) of the 2000
Agreement, the Respondent failed to provide sick and
accident benefits to employee Charles Holman.
Since about September 19, 2000, the Respondent has
failed and refused to process and meet with the Union
regarding the grievance described above.
Under section 13(g) of the 2000 Agreement, the Re-
spondent is required to pay unit employees eligible to
336 NLRB No. 107
2 DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
receive vacation time the “vacation pay no later than the
Friday prior to the starting of his/her vacation.”
On January 11, 2001, by letter of that date, the Re-
spondent announced a change to section 13(g) of the
2000 Agreement, relating to the time that the Respondent
would submit vacation payments to employees, by stat-
ing the following:
Vacation time is not paid in advance of vacation or in
place of. On the Criss Bros. pay schedule you accrue
hours per month, depending upon how many vacation
days you are entitled to. With 30 days notice you may
request what you have accrued and all vacation pay
will be paid the week you are on vacation. [Emphasis
added.]
The subject set forth above relates to wages, hours, and
other terms and conditions of employment of the unit,
and is a mandatory subject for the purposes of collective
bargaining.
The Respondent announced the change to section
13(g) of the 2000 Agreement described above without
obtaining the Union’s agreement to the change.
On January 22, 2001, in preparations for negotiations
toward a successor agreement, the Union requested, by
letter of that date, that the Respondent furnish it with the
cost of each fringe benefit, in cents per hour, and the cost
of the average hourly wage rate for unit employees.
The information requested by the Union is necessary
for, and relevant to, the Union’s performance of its duties
as the exclusive collective–bargaining representative of
the unit.
Since about January 22, 2001, the Respondent has
failed and refused to furnish the Union with information
relating to the cost, in cents per hour, of unit employees’
fringe benefits and wage rates as described above.
On or about February 15, 2001, the Union filed a
grievance alleging that the Respondent refused to grant
vacation time and pay to employee George Pettit.
Since about February 15, 2001, the Respondent has
failed and refused to meet with the Union and to process
the grievance described above.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the acts and conduct described above, the Respon-
dent has failed and refused to bargain collectively and in
good faith with the exclusive collective–bargaining rep-
resentative of its employees, and has repudiated provi-
sions of the 2000 Agreement relating to section 19–
Grievance Procedure, section 5–Check-off of Union
Dues–Initiation and/or Reinstatement Fees, and section
13(g) of the Vacations provision, and has thereby en-
gaged in unfair labor practices in violation of Section
8(a)(1) and (5) of the Act. The Respondent’s unfair la-
bor practices affect commerce within the meaning of
Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in cer-
tain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease and
desist, and to take certain affirmative action designed to
effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifically, having
found that the Respondent has violated Section 8(a)(5)
and (1) of the Act by failing since July 1, 2000, to remit
to the Union dues and fees deducted from unit employ-
ees’ earnings pursuant to section 5 of the 2000 Agree-
ment, we shall order the Respondent to remit to the Un-
ion the dues and fees that the Respondent has withheld,
including both during the term of the Agreement and
since its expiration, with interest as prescribed in New
Horizons for the Retarded, 283 NLRB 1173 (1987).
In addition, having found that the Respondent has
unlawfully failed to meet with the Union and process
grievances filed by the Union alleging that the Respon-
dent failed to provide sick and accident benefits to em-
ployee Charles Holman and alleging that the Respondent
refused to grant vacation time and pay to employee
George Pettit, we shall order the Respondent to process
these grievances and meet with the Union regarding
them, pursuant to the terms of the parties’ expired collec-
tive–bargaining agreement.
Further, having found that the Respondent unlawfully
announced a change in the contractual provision relating
to the time that the Respondent must make vacation
payments, we shall order the Respondent to rescind the
change announced on January 11, 2001, restore and
comply with the provisions set forth in section 13(g) of
the 2000 Agreement, and make employees whole for any
losses attributable to its unlawful conduct. Backpay shall
be computed in accordance with Ogle Protection Service,
183 NLRB 682 (1970), enfd. 444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir.
1971), with interest as prescribed in New Horizons for
the Retarded, supra.
Finally, having found that the Respondent violated
Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by refusing to provide the Union
with the information it requested on January 22, 2001,
we shall order the Respondent to furnish the information
to the Union.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Criss Bros., Inc., Bladensburg, Maryland,
its officers, agents, successors, and assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Failing and refusing to remit to the International
Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, and Rein-
forcing Iron Workers, Shopmen’s Local Union No. 486,
AFL–CIO, the union dues and fees that have been de-
ducted from bargaining unit employees’ earnings since
July 1, 2000. The unit is:
All production and maintenance employees of the
Company engaged in the fabrication of iron, steel, and
CRISS BROS. 3
metal products, or in maintenance work in or about the
Company’s plant or plants located at Bladensburg,
Maryland, and vicinity. Excluding office or clerical
employees, draftsmen, engineering employees, watch-
men, employees engaged in erection, installation or
construction work, and guards and supervisors as de-
fined by the Act.
(b) Failing and refusing to meet with the Union and
process grievances filed by the Union.
(c) Announcing changes in contractual provisions
without obtaining the Union’s consent to the change.
(d) Failing and refusing to furnish the Union with the
information that is necessary for, and relevant to, the
Union’s performance of its duties as the exclusive collec-
tive–bargaining representative of the unit employees.
(e) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) Remit to the Union the union dues and fees that
have been deducted from employees’ earnings since July
1, 2000, with interest, as set forth in the remedy section
of this decision.
(b) Meet with the Union, process the grievances filed
by the Union on September 19, 2000 and February 15,
2001 alleging, respectively, that the Respondent failed to
provide sick and accident benefits to employee Charles
Holman and refused to grant vacation time and pay to
employee George Pettit, and comply with the terms of
section 19 of the parties’ 2000–2001 agreement.
(c) Rescind the change announced on January 11, 2001
in the contractual provision relating to the time that the
Respondent must make vacation payments, comply with
the terms of section 13(g) of the parties’ 2000–2001
Agreement, and make employees whole for any losses
attributable to its unlawful conduct, in the manner set
forth in the remedy section of this decision.
(d) Furnish the Union with the information it requested
on January 22, 2001 concerning the cost of each fringe
benefit, in cents per hour, and the cost of the average
hourly wage rate for unit employees.
(e) On request, bargain with the Union as the exclusive
representative of the employees in the appropriate unit
set forth above concerning terms and conditions of em-
ployment and, if an understanding is reached, embody
the understanding in a signed agreement.
(f) Preserve and, within 14 days of a request, or such
additional time as the Regional Director may allow for
good cause shown, provide at a reasonable place desig-
nated by the Board or its agents, all payroll records, so-
cial security payment records, timecards, personnel re-
cords and reports, and all other records, including an
electronic copy of such records if stored in electronic
form, necessary to analyze the amount of backpay due
under the terms of this Order.
(g) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at
its facility in Bladensburg, Maryland, copies of the at-
tached notice marked “Appendix.”1 Copies of the notice,
on forms provided by the Regional Director for Region
5, after being signed by the Respondent’s authorized
representative, shall be posted by the Respondent and
maintained for 60 consecutive days in conspicuous
places including all places where notices to employees
are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken
by the Respondent to ensure that the notices are not al-
tered, defaced or covered by any other material. In the
event that, during the pendency of these proceedings, the
Respondent has gone out of business or closed the facil-
ity involved in these proceedings, the Respondent shall
duplicate and mail, at its own expense, a copy of the no-
tice to all current employees and former employees em-
ployed by the Respondent at any time since July 1, 2000.
(h) Within 21 days after service by the Region, file
with the Regional Director a sworn certification of a re-
sponsible official on a form provided by the Region at-
testing to the steps that the Respondent has taken to
comply.
Dated, Washington, D.C., November 19, 2001
Peter J. Hurtgen, Chairman
Wilma B. Liebman, Member
Dennis P. Walsh, Member
(SEAL) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
APPENDIX

NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES

POSTED BY ORDER OF THE

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

An Agency of the United States Government

The National Labor Relations Board has found that we
violated the National Labor Relations Act and has or-
dered us to post and abide by this notice.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to remit to the Interna-
tional Association of Bridge, Structural, Ornamental, and
1 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court of
appeals, the words in the notice reading “Posted by Order of the Na-
tional Labor Relations Board” shall read “Posted Pursuant to a Judg-
ment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order of the
National Labor Relations Board.”
4 DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Reinforcing Iron Workers, Shopmen’s Local Union No.
486, AFL–CIO, the union dues and fees that we have
deducted from bargaining unit employees’ earnings since
July 1, 2000. The unit is:
All production and maintenance employees of the
Company engaged in the fabrication of iron, steel, and
metal products, or in maintenance work in or about our
plant or plants located at Bladensburg, Maryland, and
vicinity. Excluding office or clerical employees,
draftsmen, engineering employees, watchmen, em-
ployees engaged in erection, installation or construction
work, and guards and supervisors as defined by the
Act.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to meet with the Union
and process grievances filed by the Union.
WE WILL NOT announce changes in contractual provi-
sions without obtaining the Union’s consent.
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to furnish the Union with
information that is necessary for, and relevant to, the
Union’s performance of its duties as the exclusive collec-
tive–bargaining representative of the unit employees.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce you in the exercise of the rights
guaranteed you by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL remit to the Union the union dues and fees
that we have deducted from employees’ earnings since
July 1, 2000, with interest.
WE WILL meet with the Union, process the grievances
filed by the Union on September 19, 2000 and February
15, 2001 alleging, respectively, that we failed to provide
sick and accident benefits to employee Charles Holman
and that we refused to grant vacation time and pay to
employee George Pettit, and WE WILL comply with sec-
tion 19 of our 2000-2001 agreement with the Union.
WE WILL rescind the change announced on January 11,
2001 in the contractual provision relating to the time that
we must make vacation payments, WE WILL comply with
the terms of section 13(g) of our 2000–2001 agreement
with the Union, and WE WILL make employees whole for
any losses attributable to our unlawful conduct, with in-
terest.
WE WILL, furnish the Union with the information it re-
quested on January 22, 2001 concerning the cost of each
fringe benefit, in cents per hour, and the cost of the aver-
age hourly wage rate for unit employees.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union as the ex-
clusive representative of our employees in the appropri-
ate unit set forth above concerning terms and conditions
of employment and, if an understanding is reached, em-
body the understanding in a signed agreement.
CRISS BROS., INC.