Connery et al.v.Boucher et al.

Patent Trials and Appeals Board

Jul 18, 2013

09814619 - (J) (P.T.A.B. Jul. 18, 2013)

Boxinterferences@uspto.gov Paper No. 22
571-272-4683 Filed: July 18, 2013

UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________

BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
________________

GLENN WILLIAM CONNERY, GARY JASZEWSKI,
and RICHARD REID
Junior Party
(US 6,956,853)

v.

LAURENCE B. BOUCHER, STEPHEN E. BLIGHTMAN. PETER K. CRAFT,
DAVID A. HIGGEN, CLIVE M. PHILBRICK, and DARYL D. STARR
Senior Party
(Appl. No. 09/692,561)
________________

Patent Interference No, 105,909 (JGN)
________________

Before DEBORAH KATZ, JACQUELINE WRIGHT BONILLA, and
JOHN G. NEW, Administrative Patent Judges.

PER CURIAM
JUDGMENT
Bd.R. 127(b)
Requested

Boucher et al., the senior party (“Boucher”), requested a conference
concerning the Order Setting Motion Times pursuant to the Order entered by the
Interference No. 105,951

2

Board on September 27, 2012.1 The conference call was held on July 12, 2013.
Hector J. Ribera appeared for the junior party, Connery et al. (“Connery”); Michael
Siekman and Lawrence Green appeared for Boucher.
During the conference call, Boucher requested judgment in its favor
pursuant to Bd.R. 127(b). Connery indicated that it did not oppose Boucher’s oral
motion.
It is ORDERED that judgment against Connery is entered because it has
abandoned the contest. (Bd. R. 127(b)(4).)
It is FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment is entered against US 6,956,853
for counts 1 and 2, and
Claims 1-20 of US 6,956,853 are CANCELED.

cc:
MARK A. LAUER and THOMAS W. LATHRAM, Silicon Edge Law Group LLP,
of Pleasanton, California, and CHARLES L. GHOLZ, Oblon, Spivak,
McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C., of Alexandria, Virginia.

ROBERT R. SACHS and HECTOR J. RIBERA, Fenwick & West LLP, of
Mountain View, California, and ANTHONY M. ZUPCIC, Fitzpatrick Cella
Harper & Scinto, of New York, New York.

Records of US 6,956,853 and the 09/692,561 application, respectively.

1 Paper 17.