Complainant,v.Robert McDonald, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 20, 2015
0520150290 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 20, 2015)

0520150290

08-20-2015

Complainant, v. Robert McDonald, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Complainant,

v.

Robert McDonald,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Request No. 0520150290

Appeal No. 0120121517

Agency No. 200I05732009104813

DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Complainant v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 0120121517 (February 12, 2015). EEOC regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c).

At the time of the events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Police Officer at the Agency's VA North Florida/South Georgia Healthcare System in Gainesville, Florida. Complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that the Agency discriminated against him and subjected him to a hostile work environment on the basis of disability when: (1) on January 6, 2009, after he was released by his doctor to return to work in a light-duty status, his supervisor informed him that there were no light duty positions available; (2) on January 15, 2009, management required him to undergo a fitness-for-duty examination; and (3) on February 2, 2009, he was not allowed to return to work even though his doctor approved him to return to full-duty status.

Complainant initially requested a hearing, but subsequently withdrew his request. Our prior appellate decision affirmed Agency's decision, based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, which concluded that Complainant failed to prove his discrimination claims.

In his request for reconsideration, Complainant expresses his disagreement with the previous decision and presents some of the same arguments he raised on appeal. We emphasize that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. See EEO MD-110, Ch. 9, � VII.A. Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here.

After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120121517 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

August 20, 2015

__________________

Date

2

0520150290

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0520150290