0120141767
09-05-2014
Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Eastern Area), Agency.
Complainant,
v.
Patrick R. Donahoe,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Eastern Area),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120141767
Agency No. 4C450013813
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated February 27, 2014, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq.
BACKGROUND
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Occupational Health Nurse at the Cincinnati District facility in Cincinnati, Ohio.
On February 6, 2014, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the bases of race (Caucasian), disability, age (59), and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity when, between October 2009 and April 2012: there were issues with the way her medical information was handled; in March 2013, she was told she would no longer have a job and, on April 12, 2013, she was removed from her position; when she returned to work following a grievance settlement, her supervisor told her she was "on the carpet"; her manager did not follow the mandated protocol with respect to her medical files; she was sent for a fitness-for-duty examination and was not allowed to return to work until eleven days following a negative drug screen; and on October 17, 2013, she was told she was being interviewed for reporting a hostile work environment.
The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), due to the untimely filing of the formal complaint, as well as for failing to contact an EEO counselor with respect to some claims.. The instant appeal followed. In her appeal, Complainant states she was hospitalized in September 2013, and that the EEO paperwork caught her by surprise. She states she felt she needed to consult with an attorney, but could not find one that was within her budget.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2) states, in pertinent part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint which fails to comply with the applicable time limits contained in 29 C.F.R. � 1614.106, which, in turn, requires the filing of a formal complaint within fifteen (15) days of receiving notice of the right to do so.
The record discloses that Complainant received the notice of right to file a formal complaint on October 19, 2013. Although the notice indicated that Complainant had to file a formal complaint within fifteen (15) calendar days of its receipt, Complainant did not file her formal complaint until February 6, 2014, which is well beyond the limitation period. On appeal, Complainant has not offered adequate justification to warrant an extension of the time limit for filing the complaint. We have consistently held, in cases involving physical or mental health difficulties, that an extension is warranted only where an individual is so incapacitated by his/her condition that s/he is unable to meet the regulatory time limits. See Davis v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05980475 (Aug. 6, 1998); Crear v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05920700 (Oct. 29, 1992). Complainant did not submit any medical documentation to support a claim of incapacity. Because we find that the formal complaint was untimely filed, we need not address the Agency's alternate reasons for dismissing some of the claims.
Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and
the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
September 5, 2014
__________________
Date
2
0120141767
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120141767