Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Eastern Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Feb 7, 2013

0120113693 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 7, 2013)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013

,
Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Eastern Area),
Agency.

Appeal No. 0120113693

Agency No. 4C-440-0077-11

DECISION

Complainant filed an appeal with this Commission from the Agency’s decision dated June 22,
2011, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section
501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et
seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that Complainant’s complaint was improperly
dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Letter Carrier at
the Agency’s Station B facility in Cleveland, Ohio. On June 1, 2011, Complainant filed a
formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the bases of her
disability (back injury) and in reprisal for prior protected EEO activity when: (1) on February
7, 2011, she notified management that since August 2010, she had not received Continuation
of Pay and her health insurance had been overcharged; and (2) on May 24, 2011, she was
advised that her life insurance had been cancelled.

On June 22, 2011, the Agency issued a final decision dismissing the instant complaint for
failure to state a claim, pursuant to 29 C.F.R § 1614.107(a)(1). The Agency found that
Complainant was alleging dissatisfaction with issues related to her Office of Workers’
Compensation (OWCP) claim, and therefore the instant complaint constitutes a collateral attack
on the OWCP process.

0120113693

2

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The Commission determines that the Agency improperly construed the instant complaint as a
collateral attack on the OWCP process. The matters identified in claims (1) and (2) do not
make reference to any dissatisfaction with the OWCP process. A review of the record
confirms that Complainant’s claim was accepted by OWCP, however Complainant alleges that
despite providing the Agency with the required documentation to support her request,
management has refused to provide her with continuation of pay. We find that the alleged
failure to provide continuation of pay is an Agency action and, therefore, not a matter for the
Department of Labor. See Chi v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No.
0120114219 (November 5, 2012). Additionally, we note that Complainant’s allegations with
respect to her health insurance and the cancellation of her life insurance relate to an alleged
failure by the Agency’s human resource management. We therefore determine that the Agency
improperly dismissed the instant complaint for failure to state a claim as Complainant has
shown an injury or harm to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a
remedy. See Diaz v. Dep’t of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant’s complaint is REVERSED.
The complaint is REMANDED to the Agency for further processing in accordance with this
decision and the Order herein.

ORDER (E0610)
The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with 29 C.F.R.
§1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the
remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The
Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify
Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date
this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the
Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision
within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.
A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that
transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as
referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION’S DECISION (K0610)

Compliance with the Commission’s corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit
its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered
0120113693

3
corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC
20013. The Agency’s report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must
send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the
Commission’s order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the
order. 29 C.F.R. § 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to
enforce compliance with the Commission’s order prior to or following an administrative
petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R.
§ 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the
underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled “Right to File a Civil
Action.” 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil
action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)
(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing
of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R.
§ 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant
or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to
establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material
fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices,
or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of
Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within
twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See
29 C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R.
Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be
submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days
of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or
opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration
as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any
supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The
Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very
limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).
0120113693

4

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0610)

This is a decision requiring the Agency to continue its administrative processing of your
complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil action, you have the right to file such action in
an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that
you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and
eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or filed your
appeal with the Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the
complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that
person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of
your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil action will terminate the
administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an
attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you
and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other
security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et
seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or
denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney
with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and
the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to
File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations

February 7, 2013
Date