0520150220
05-28-2015
Complainant, v. Martin J. Gruenberg, Chairman, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Agency.
Complainant,
v.
Martin J. Gruenberg,
Chairman,
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation,
Agency.
Request No. 0520150220
Appeal No. 0120121862
Agency No. FDICEO090007
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Complainant v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, EEOC Appeal No. 0120121862 (December 24, 2014). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c).
At the time of events giving rise to the underlying complaint, Complainant was a Mid-Career Examiner at the Agency's work facility in St. Louis, Missouri. Complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that the Agency discriminated against her on the bases of race (African American) and age (49 when she was subjected to harassment that created a hostile work environment.1 Complainant indicated that: (1) on March 2, 2009, she received a memo from her supervisor indicating that she would not receive a 2009 salary increase and lump sum payment because she had a received a performance rating of "does not meet expectations" for the 2008 rating period; (2) the supervisor and commissioned examiners openly challenged favorable assessments of Complainant's performance by examiners-in charge (EICs) to whom she was assigned, and strongly influenced them not to give her positive assessments (four examples provided); (3) from June 2008 to present, the supervisor and certain examiners developed a negative attitude toward training and coaching Complainant in comparison to other new examiners (six examples provided); and (4) the supervisor and the examiners have continuously humiliated Complainant by making personal attacks against her character, and she is treated in a disrespectful and abusive manner by the supervisor on a regular basis (five examples provided).
Complainant initially requested a hearing, but withdrew her request. Our prior appellate decision affirmed the Agency's final decision, based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, including information gathered before Complainant withdrew her hearing request, that concluded that Complainant failed to prove her discrimination claims.
In her request for reconsideration, Complainant expresses her disagreement with the previous decision and reiterates arguments she has previously made. We emphasize that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. See EEO MD-110, Ch. 9, � VII.A. Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here.
After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120121862 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
May 28, 2015
__________________
Date
1 Complainant initially listed 61 alleged incidents.
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
2
0520150220
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0520150220