01-2006-2995_Thomas
12-05-2007
Cocandra D. Thomas, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area) Agency.
Cocandra D. Thomas,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
(Southeast Area)
Agency.
Appeal No. 01200629951
Agency No. 1H391000905
Hearing No. 130-2005-00236X
DECISION
Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's
appeal from the agency's March 15, 2006 final order concerning her equal
employment opportunity (EEO) complaint alleging employment discrimination
in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as
amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation
Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.
Complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against her on the bases
of disability (hip) and in reprisal for prior protected EEO activity when:
(1) on December 23, 2004, she was denied overtime; (2) on February 8,
15, and 22, 2005, she was denied off-day and holiday overtime; and (3)
she was subjected to harassment from March 14, 2005 through April 18,
2005 when (a) her supervisor tried to force her to sign a new modified
job offer - changing her work hours and days off; (b) she was placed
off the clock and not allowed to return to work until she signed the
job offer; and (c) after an absence due to stress, she was required to
receive medical clearance by her doctor.
Following a hearing, an Administrative Judge (AJ) concluded that with
respect to Issues 1 and 2, the preponderance of the evidence established
that the agency articulated a legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for
not allowing complainant to work overtime on her days off, or on holidays,
i.e., she had been accommodated for her restrictions, by being placed in
a limited duty job assignment, and because of her restrictions, she could
not perform the full range of duties that would have been required of her
had she been allowed to work overtime. In addition, the AJ concluded
that complainant failed to establish a prima facie case of reprisal
because the preponderance of the evidence shows that the responsible
management officials were unaware of complainant's prior EEO activity.
With respect to Issue 3, the AJ concluded that the available evidence
does not establish a prima facie case of harassment. According to the AJ,
the agency's conduct, in requiring complainant to sign a new modified
job offer was consistent with its work related needs. Further, placing
complainant off the clock was a reasonable response to her refusal to
sign the new modified job offer. A medical return to work clearance was
required of all employees who had been off work due to stress related
illnesses.2
After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration
of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the final agency order because
the Administrative Judge's ultimate finding, that unlawful employment
discrimination was not proven by a preponderance of the evidence, is
supported by the record.3
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the
policies, practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the
defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
December 5, 2007
__________________
Date
1 Due to a new data system, complainant's case has been re-designated
with the above-referenced appeal number.
2 The AJ's conclusions are also consistent with finding insufficient
evidence of disparate treatment with respect to Issues 3(a), (b) or (c).
3 For purposes of this decision, the Commission assumes, without deciding,
that complainant is an individual with a disability.
??
??
??
??
4
0120062995
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P. O. Box 19848
Washington, D.C. 20036