Cleveland B. Kersey, Complainant,v.Dr. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 13, 2005
01a55297 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 13, 2005)

01a55297

12-13-2005

Cleveland B. Kersey, Complainant, v. Dr. Francis J. Harvey, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Cleveland B. Kersey v. Department of the Army

01A55297

December 13, 2005

.

Cleveland B. Kersey,

Complainant,

v.

Dr. Francis J. Harvey,

Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A55297

Agency No. ARFTLEAV04MAY09131

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated July 22, 2005, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and

the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 621 et seq. In his complaint, complainant alleged that he

was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race (African-American),

religion (African Methodist Episcopal), age (D.O.B. December 18, 1951),

and reprisal for prior EEO activity when:

Effective April 3, 2005 he was demoted from a licensed clinical social

worker, GS-11 to an Inmate Services Clerk, GS-05: and

His senior rater judged him intolerant of a lesbian colleague and not

supportive of the open homosexual identity of an inmate during a group

session conducted in July 2004.

The agency dismissed the claims under 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(4), finding

that complainant had elected to pursue the matter under a negotiated

grievance procedure. On appeal, complainant argues that the issues

of discrimination were not addressed in his grievance. The agency on

appeal argues that complainant had the opportunity to raise issues of

discrimination during the procedure, and that if he was unsatisfied with

the initial grievance decision, he had the option to request mediation

and, following that, arbitration, neither of which complainant chose

to do.

We note that under 29 C.F.R. � 1614.301(a) a person may file a complaint

under either the negotiated grievance procedure or the EEO procedure,

but not both. Furthermore, a person �who files a grievance with an

agency . . . may not thereafter file a (discrimination) complaint

on the same matter . . . irrespective of whether . . . the grievance

has raised an issue of discrimination.� Id. The record shows that

complainant filed a grievance on his demotion on April 15, 2005 in which

he included as one reason for his demotion the fact that his rater felt

complainant was intolerant of a lesbian colleague and unsupportive of

the open homosexual identity of an inmate. The record further shows

that complainant filed his Formal EEO Complaint on the same matters on

June 23, 2005. Given the fact that he filed his grievance before filing

his EEO Complaint, under the applicable regulations, his EEO Complaint

must be dismissed. Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 13, 2005

__________________

Date