01a02648
07-20-2000
Cleotilde H. Gonzales, Complainant, v. Agency.
Cleotilde H. Gonzales v. United States Postal Service
01A02648
July 20, 2000
.
Cleotilde H. Gonzales,
Complainant,
v.
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A02648
Agency No. 4-G-780-0424-99
DECISION
Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was
properly dismissed pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to
be codified and hereinafter referred to as EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �
1614.107(a)(1)).<1> Complainant alleged that she was discriminated
against on the basis of reprisal when:
on July 14, 1999, the Office of the United States Attorney for the
Western District of Texas filed an ethics advisory questioning the
conduct of a private attorney who has represented several members of
an organization with which complainant is affiliated.
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)) provides, in relevant part,
that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim.
An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee
or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been
discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,
sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103,
.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined
an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with
respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which
there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request
No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).
In the instant matter complainant has failed to demonstrate how the
incident described in her complaint, has caused her to suffer harm with
respect to a term, privilege, or condition of her employment with the
postal service. On appeal, no persuasive arguments or evidence have been
presented regarding whether complainant has stated a claim, i.e., to show
that complainant was injured by the incident raised. Accordingly, the
agency's final decision dismissing complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0300)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management
Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must
also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS
THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD
OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND
OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
July 20, 2000
__________________
Date
FOR OFO INTERNAL CIRCULATION ONLY
FOR PROCEDURAL CASES
TO: CARLTON M. HADDEN, ACTING DIR.
OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS
APPEAL NUMBER:
01A02648
AGENCY NUMBER:
4-G-780-0424-99
(APPROVED) (DATE)
REQUEST NUMBER:
HEARING NUMBER:
THE ATTACHED DECISION IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL:
TITLE
NAMES
INITIAL
DATE REVIEWED
(ATTORNEY):
Sabrina R. Lewis
July 13, 2000
(SUPERVISOR:
Joel Cavicchia
(DIVISION DIRECTOR):
1.) (COMPLAINANT(S)
Cleotilde H. Gonzales
2.) (AGENCY)
United States Postal Service
3.) (DECISION)
Affirmed
4.) (STATUTE(S)
Title VII.
5.) (BASIS(ES)
OR
6.) (ISSUE(S)
O1
7.) (TYPIST/DATE/DISK)
SL1/ July 13, 2000
SPELL CHECK:
YES
(PLEASE CHECK ALL APPLICABLE CODES)
PROCEDURAL CODES
LETTER CLOSURE CODES
X 3K - PROCEDURAL DECISION
? 3N - APPEAL DENIED/DISMISSED
? 3P - ADVERSE INFERENCE RAISED
X 4H - OFO AFFIRMED FAD
? 3M - OFO REVERSED AND REMANDED
? 4J - OFO MODIFIED FAD
? 3L - OFO VACATED/REMANDED ALL OF
AGENCY'S MERITS DECISION
? 4Q - COMPLIANCE REQUIRED
? 3B - FAD RESCINDED
? 3C - DUPLICATE DOCKET NUMBER
? 3D - WITHDRAWAL
? 3E - COMPLAINT SETTLED
? 3G - OTHER LETTER CLOSURE
? 3R - RETURN TO AG FOR CONSOLIDATION
? 3S - RETURN TO AJ FOR CONSOLIDATION
? 7N - CIVIL ACTION FILED
REVISED AS OF 2/3/00
1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.