Clarence G.,1 Complainant,v.Ryan D. McCarthy, Acting Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 21, 2017
0120172953 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 21, 2017)

0120172953

11-21-2017

Clarence G.,1 Complainant, v. Ryan D. McCarthy, Acting Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

Clarence G.,1

Complainant,

v.

Ryan D. McCarthy,

Acting Secretary,

Department of the Army,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120172953

Agency No. ARHQOSA16OCT04219

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) from the Agency's decision dated June 5, 2017, dismissing his complaint alleing unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Human Resources Assistant at the Agency's facility in Omaha, Nebraska.

On November 10, 2016, Complainant filed a formal EEO complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him to discrimination on the bases of race (African-American), sex (male), and color when: (1) from May 2011 to April 2016, Complainant was bullied and emasculated by being reminded who was in charge, and subjected to a work environment where negative sentiments were expressed about President Obama because he is a black man; (2) in spring 2011, a named manager shared a joke with Complainant containing a racial epithet, combined with the sound effects of a chainsaw; (3) in spring 2013, this same manager confided in Complainant that two other employees were lesbians; (4) in December 2013, Complainant shared some concerns with the manager about a conversation he had with another employee that had racial undertones and the manager dismissed his concerns; (5) in December 2013, the manager shared Complainant's concerns discussed in allegation 4 with the employee in question, causing his relationship with that employee to deteriorate; (6) in May 2011, Complainant was told he fit a quota and "hit two wickets" because he was black and a male; and (7) in May 2011, Complainant was asked whether he could make it "in a lily white/good ol' boys organization."

The Agency dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor contact. The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

As an initial matter, in its response to the appeal, the Agency requests that the appeal be dismissed as untimely filed. The Agency asserts it sent its June 5, 2017 dismissal to Complainant's attorney of record at the time. Complainant did not file his appeal until September 11, 2017. However, we find that the Agency provided no proof of when the dismissal decision was received by the attorney, and it is undisputed that the Agency did not also serve Complainant with the decision. Where, as here, there is an issue of timeliness, "[a]n agency always bears the burden of obtaining sufficient information to support a reasoned determination as to timeliness." Guy v. Department of Energy, EEOC Request No. 05930703 (January 4, 1994) (quoting Williams v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05920506 (August 25, 1992)). On appeal, Complainant states he received the June 5 dismissal decision from his attorney on August 18, 2017, and filed his appeal less than 30 days later. Based on these circumstances, we conclude that the Agency has not established that Complainant's appeal was untimely filed.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

The record discloses that the latest alleged discriminatory event occurred in April 2016, but Complainant did not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until September 29, 2016, which is well beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period. On appeal, Complainant has presented no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the time limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0617)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision. A party shall have twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration in which to submit a brief or statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at Chap. 9 � VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Complainant's request may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The agency's request must be submitted in digital format via the EEOC's Federal Sector EEO Portal (FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.403(g). The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)

If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 21, 2017

__________________

Date

1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120172953