Charles W. Widmer, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 25, 2010
0120093625 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 25, 2010)

0120093625

02-25-2010

Charles W. Widmer, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.


Charles W. Widmer,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southwest Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120093625

Agency No. 1G721004008

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) from a final agency decision (FAD)

dated August 10, 2009, dismissing his complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and Section 501

of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended,

29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. In his complaint, complainant alleged that

he was subjected to discrimination on the basis of reprisal for prior

protected EEO activity when beginning on February 15, 2008, his annual

leave balance was reduced by 8 hours per pay period.1

The agency dismissed complainant's complaint under 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(2) on the grounds that it was untimely filed. A "certificate

of service" indicates that a notice of right to file a complaint

was mailed to complainant and his attorney on November 20, 2008.

Complainant's attorney signed a receipt indicating he received the notice

on November 26, 2008. The agency determined that complainant did not file

his complaint with the agency until July 20, 2009, beyond the fifteen day

time limit. The record reflects that the Notice informed complainant of

the 15 day time limitation and of the address at the agency for filing

the formal complaint.

The record reflects that complainant filed his complaint with this

Commission on December 3, 2008. The Commission forwarded the complaint

to the agency in July 2009, and it was received by it on July 20, 2009.

In its FAD, the agency found that the filing of the complaint with the

Commission did not excuse the late filing of the complaint with the

agency.

On appeal, complainant writes that he made an error when he mailed his

complaint to the EEOC rather than the agency. Complainant writes that

the address of the EEOC is on the second page of the complaint form.

He writes that he was suffering from major depression and generalized

anxiety disorder, and was having difficulty concentrating and following

instructions during that time. The second page of the complaint

form contains detailed overall information about the EEO complaint

process, and gives the EEOC address for filing administrative appeals.

In opposition to the appeal, the agency argues that its final decision

should be affirmed.

The Commission has previously held that when provided with the proper

address, filing at the wrong address does not constitute a proper filing.

See Pacheco v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05930700

(September 10, 1993) (appeal untimely when sent to wrong address despite

receipt of proper instructions), Heald v. United States Postal Service,

EEOC Appeal No. 0120092529 (September 17, 2009) (above principle

applied to a formal complaint that was incorrectly filed with the

Commission and untimely filed with the agency). The notice of right to

file the complaint gave clear explicit instructions on where to file.

Complainant's arguments on appeal are not persuasive. Accordingly,

we do not construe complainant's December 3, 2008 correspondence with

the Commission as constituting a timely filing of the complaint.

The FAD is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 25, 2010

__________________

Date

1 Complainant contended that because his ongoing absence was due to

an illness or injury approved Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

(OWCP), his annual leave balance should not be deducted.

??

??

??

??

2

0120093625

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120093625