Chad S. Scherr, Complainant,v.Linda M. Springer, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionNov 6, 2008
0520090008 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 6, 2008)

0520090008

11-06-2008

Chad S. Scherr, Complainant, v. Linda M. Springer, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Agency.


Chad S. Scherr,

Complainant,

v.

Linda M. Springer,

Director,

Office of Personnel Management,

Agency.

Request No. 0520090008

Appeal No. 0120082862

Agency No. 2008003

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Chad

S. Scherr v. Office of Personnel Management, EEOC Appeal No. 0120082862

(August 21, 2008). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may,

in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on

the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).

The previous decision affirmed the dismissal of complainant's complaint on

the grounds that it alleged dissatisfaction with the agency's processing

of a previously filed complaint, and the Commission already addressed

his dissatisfaction claims in Scherr v. Office of Personnel Management,

EEOC Appeal No. 0120080529 (March 28, 2008).1

On request, complainant states that despite his previous request to

the Commission for a complete copy of all papers the agency sent the

Commission in his case, he has not received them. He wants to ensure

that the Commission received a complete "unaltered" copy of the file,

with no omissions or falsifications, and asks that processing of his

case be placed on hold until the Commission provides him the papers.

Complainant does not contest the previous decision's characterization

of his claim.

After reconsidering the previous decision and the entire record,

the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the

request. Complainant does not explain with any specificity how receiving

a copy of the complaint file could potentially lead to information

that would satisfy the criteria for reconsideration, and we can discern

none, given the reasons the previous decision affirmed the dismissal of

the complaint. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120082862 remains the

Commission's final decision. There is no further right of administrative

appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

November 6, 2008

__________________

Date

1 The Commission denied complainant's request to reconsider this decision.

EEOC Request No. 0520080468 (July 15, 2008).

??

??

??

??

2

0520090008

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

2

0520090008