Carroll J. Andre, Complainant,v.Gale A. Norton, Secretary, Department of the Interior, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 30, 2003
01A30977_r (E.E.O.C. Sep. 30, 2003)

01A30977_r

09-30-2003

Carroll J. Andre, Complainant, v. Gale A. Norton, Secretary, Department of the Interior, Agency.


Carroll J. Andre v. Department of the Interior

01A30977

September 30, 2003

.

Carroll J. Andre,

Complainant,

v.

Gale A. Norton,

Secretary,

Department of the Interior,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A30977

Agency No. FNP-2002-100

DECISION

Complainant appealed to this Commission from the agency's October 10, 2002

final decision to dismiss his employment discrimination complaint. In his

complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination

on the basis of reprisal for his opposition to violations of Section 501

of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29

U.S.C. � 791 et seq. when on April 5, 2002, complainant's supervisor sent

complainant an e-mail threatening to reprimand him for insubordination.

The agency dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim,

finding that complainant failed to allege any concrete harm to a term,

condition, or privilege of employment. On appeal, complainant argues

that he suffered "irreparable" harm when he was threatened in the April

5, 2002 e-mail, and removed from an investigation for misuse of funds.

He contends that the agency's action constituted unlawful harassment.

Complainant, an EEO Enforcement Officer, allegedly discovered that the

agency failed to build a wheelchair access ramp to the restrooms in its

Office of Human Resources, although it appropriated funds for the task.

In the April 5, 2002 e-mail, complainant's supervisor informed him

that, as previously discussed, complainant's investigation into the

matter should address only the issue of access to the restrooms, not the

misappropriation of funds. The supervisor further informed complainant

that he learned complainant was discussing the misuse of funds with

witnesses during his investigation, in direct contradiction to the

supervisor's instructions. He warned complainant that to the extent he

is acting as a representative of the EEO Office, any further discussion

of the agency's misuse of funds would be considered insubordination.

Nonetheless, the e-mail further informed complainant that when he is

not representing the EEO Office in an official capacity, "you are free

to address this issue in any way that you like, [and] to report and/or

follow[-]up with the IG's office if you so choose."

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in

relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to

state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved

employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been

discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,

sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103,

.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined

an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with

respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which

there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request

No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). Hostile work environment harassment is

actionable if it sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions

of complainant's employment. See Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.,

510 U.S. 17, 21 (1993).

Complainant has not alleged any harm to a term, condition, or privilege

of employment. Further, the agency's actions are not so severe or

pervasive as to alter the conditions of complainant's employment.

Complainant has not shown how he was harmed, or that the agency's

action was reasonably likely to deter his opposition to the alleged

violations of the Rehabilitation Act. Complainant was not disciplined,

and was not prohibited from pursuing the Rehabilitation Act issue in

his investigation.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the agency's dismissal is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

September 30, 2003

__________________

Date