0120131044
06-13-2013
Carolyn M. Leek,
Complainant,
v.
Patrick R. Donahoe,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service
(Eastern Area),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120131044
Agency No. 1C-404-0027-12
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's decision dated December 12, 2012, dismissing her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.
BACKGROUND
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked as a Mail Processing Clerk at the Agency's Processing and Distribution Center facility in Louisville, Kentucky.
On August 17, 2012, Complainant contacted the EEO Office regarding the calculations of her Office of Workers Compensation Program (OWCP) retirement pay and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) pertaining to her annual leave prior to and after submitted her request for disability or regular retirement. When the matter could not be resolved informally, on November 9, 2012, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the bases of disability and reprisal for prior protected EEO activity under Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 when:
1. Complainant received a letter on March 7, 2012, that effective April 14, 2012; Complainant would be separated from her position with the Agency.
2. On April 16, 2012, Complainant received a letter about her annual leave total that informed her that they could not take her off the rolls until they could pay all of her back annual leave.
Based on the record, the Agency redefined claim (2) to be:
2. When on or about August 16, 2012, the Agency's Human Resources Center and EEO Office told Complainant that they had nothing to do with Complainant's retirement pay regarding OWCP and/or OPM calculations pertaining to accrual annual leave owed to Complainant prior to and after her submission for disability or regular retirement.
The Agency then dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). The Agency dismissed claim (1) finding that Complainant had previously raised this matter in a prior EEO complaint, namely Agency No. 1C-404-0019-12. The Agency noted that Complainant had withdrawn the matter. As to claim (2), the Agency determined that Complainant alleged discrimination for annual leave accrued and 25% of her wages due to being on OWCP. The Agency determined that claim (2) should be dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim because this claim constituted a collateral attack on the OWCP process and for matters that are under the jurisdiction of OPM. As such, the Agency dismissed the complaint.
This appeal followed.
ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS
The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides that the agency shall dismiss a complaint that states the same claim that is pending before or has been decided by the Agency or Commission. The Agency provided a form in which Complainant indicated her intent to withdraw her prior EEO complaint, namely Agency No. 1C-404-0019-12. In addition, it provided a printout of its internal tracking system indicting that Complainant's EEO compliant in Agency No. 1C-404-0019-12 involved the letter of removal raised in claim (1). However, the Agency failed to provide a copy of Complainant's initial contact form; the EEO Counselor's report; or Complainant's formal complaint (if she had filed a formal complaint). As such, we cannot find that the Agency created tracking document is not sufficient to prove that Complainant's prior EEO complaint involved the letter of removal. As such, we determine that the Agency failed to substantiate its dismissal of claim (1).
The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in relevant part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (Apr. 21, 1994). The Commission has held that an employee cannot use the EEO complaint process to lodge a collateral attack on another proceeding. See Wills v. Dep't of Def., EEOC Request No. 05970596 (July 30, 1998); Kleinman v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05940585 (Sept. 22, 1994); Lingad v. U.S. Postal Serv., EEOC Request No. 05930106 (June 25, 1993). In claim (2), Complainant alleged that calculations made by OWCP and OPM were not correct. We find that such a claim against OWCP and OPM constitute a collateral attack against those entities. Therefore, we find that the Agency's dismissal of claim (2) pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim was appropriate.
CONCLUSION
Based on a thorough review of the record and the contentions on appeal, including those not specifically addressed herein, we AFFIRM the dismissal of claim (2). The Commission also REVERSES and REMANDS the Agency's dismissal of claim (1) and REMANDS claim (1) in accordance with the ORDER below.
ORDER (E0610)
The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claim, namely claim (1), in accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to the Complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the Complainant requests a final decision without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.
A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0610)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory. The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30) calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. The Agency's report must contain supporting documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to the Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order, the Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The Complainant also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively, the Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c) (1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0610)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0610)
This decision affirms the Agency's final decision/action in part, but it also requires the Agency to continue its administrative processing of a portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your complaint with the Agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until such time as the Agency issues its final decision on your complaint. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File a Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
June 13, 2013
__________________
Date
2
0120131044
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
2
0120131044