Carolyn J. Thompson, Complainant,v.Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Western Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 12, 2012
0120113825 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 12, 2012)

0120113825

01-12-2012

Carolyn J. Thompson, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Western Area), Agency.




Carolyn J. Thompson,

Complainant,

v.

Patrick R. Donahoe,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(Western Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120113825

Agency No. 1E982002111

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated June 22, 2011, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of the Age Discrimination in

Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that Complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(4) for first

raising the matter with the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB).

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant worked

as a Mailhandler at the Agency’s Seattle NDC facility in Federal Way,

Washington.

On March 23, 2011, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that

the Agency subjected her to discrimination on the basis of age (42)

when on January 26, 2011, she was informed that there was no work

available within her restrictions and she was sent home under the

National Reassessment Process.1

Complainant filed an appeal with the MSPB on January 31, 2011 Complainant

withdrew her appeal with the MSPB, and the matter was dismissed as noted

in a decision dated April 1, 2011.2 After she withdrew her MSPB appeal,

Complainant filed the instant complaint.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

In the instant case, the record clearly shows that Complainant filed an

appeal with the MSPB before she filed her formal complaint. In accordance

with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.302(b), a person may file an appeal with the MSPB

or a formal complaint on the same matter, but not both. Complainant did

not wait for the MSPB to make a decision on the matter of jurisdiction.

As such, she is viewed as having made her election to pursue the MSPB

process prior to filing her EEO complaint. Regardless of whether she

raised age discrimination in her MSPB appeal, she could have done so if

she so chose. Merely because she did not raise a basis in her MSPB appeal

does not entitle her to also file an EEO complaint on the same issues.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's

complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0610)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party’s timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. § 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive

for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), at 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

77960, Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency

head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full

name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal

of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0610)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. §§ 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time limits

as stated in the paragraph above (“Right to File a Civil Action”).

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 12, 2012

__________________

Date

1 Complainant also raised a claim of discrimination based on

disability. The Agency indicated that claim has been subsumed into the

McConnell class action lawsuit.

2 The MSPB decision indicates that Complainant returned to work on

February 12, 2011 without restrictions.

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

---------------

------------------------------------------------------------

2

0120113825

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120113825