Carol M. Bowles, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 20, 2008
0520080445 (E.E.O.C. May. 20, 2008)

0520080445

05-20-2008

Carol M. Bowles, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Carol M. Bowles,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Request No. 0520080445

Appeal No. 0120064601

Hearing No. 120-2006-00059X

Agency No. 1C241001605

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Carol

M. Bowles v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120064601

(March 19, 2008). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may,

in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on

the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).

In her complaint, complainant claimed discrimination on the bases of race

(Caucasian), sex (female), disability (shoulder, hand, and wrist), and

age (54), when she was reassigned to a different position with different

hours and days off in April 2005. The EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ)

assigned to the matter, issued a decision without a hearing finding

no discrimination. The agency fully implemented the decision and the

Commission affirmed the finding of no discrimination.

In complainant's request for reconsideration, she contends the agency

has disregarded the American Postal Workers Union Collective Bargaining

Agreement and the EL505 Manual concerning Limited and Injured on Duty

Employees. She also contends that the agency was aware that her medical

restrictions were permanent and that maximum medical improvement had

been reached.

After reconsidering the previous decision and the entire record, the

Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny

the request. The Commission finds that complainant failed to show that

the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law or that the appellate decision will have

a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of

the agency. Further, the Commission finds that the arguments made in

her request for reconsideration were previously argued. Accordingly,

the decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120064601 remains the Commission's

final decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on

the decision of the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your

time in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil

action must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph

above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

_____05-20-08_____________

Date

2

0520080445

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0520080445