01A14633_r
03-01-2002
Carlos R. Verver, Complainant, v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.
Carlos R. Verver v. Department of Transportation
01A14633
March 1, 2002
.
Carlos R. Verver,
Complainant,
v.
Norman Y. Mineta,
Secretary,
Department of Transportation,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A14633
Agency No. 5-01-5078
DECISION
Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency properly dismissed
complainant's complaint. In his complaint, dated June 8, 2001, with
an attachment dated June 10, 2001, complainant claimed that he was
discriminated against on the bases of national origin (Hispanic), age
(57), disability, and in retaliation for prior EEO activity when:
The agency did not process complainant's workers' compensation (OWCP)
claims in a timely manner, and did not coordinate complainant's EEO
litigation with his OWCP claims; and
The agency created a �hostile work environment� that led to the
termination of complainant's employment.
The Commission finds that claim 1 of complainant's complaint was
properly dismissed for failure to state a claim, pursuant to 29
C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1). The Commission has held that an employee
cannot use the EEO complaint process to lodge a collateral attack on
another forum's proceeding. See Wills v. Department of Defense, EEOC
Request No. 05970596 (July 30, 1998); Kleinman v. U.S. Postal Service,
EEOC Request No. 05940585 (September 22, 1994); Lingad v. U.S. Postal
Service, EEOC Request No. 05930106 (June 24, 1993). The proper forum
for complainant to have raised his challenge to actions that occurred
during the processing of his OWCP claims was with the Department of Labor.
It is inappropriate to now attempt to use the EEO process to collaterally
attack actions which occurred during the processing of his workers'
compensation claims. Complainant also failed to identify how the agency's
failure to coordinate complainant's EEO litigation with his OWCP claims
adversely affected a term, condition, or privilege of his employment.
Claim 1 was properly dismissed for failure to state a claim.
Additionally, the Commission finds that claim 2 of complainant's complaint
was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(3) for filing
a civil action on the same matter. On January 13, 1994, complainant,
by his attorney, filed a civil action regarding claim 2 in the United
States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas. As noted
by complainant in the attachment to his complaint, on July 12, 1995,
complainant filed a Motion to Amend his civil action against the agency
to include his removal from federal service. Therefore, the agency
properly dismissed claim 2.
The agency's decision to dismiss complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
March 1, 2002
__________________
Date