Carla Ray, Complainant,v.R. James Nicholson, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 9, 2007
0120064099 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 9, 2007)

0120064099

01-09-2007

Carla Ray, Complainant, v. R. James Nicholson, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Carla Ray,

Complainant,

v.

R. James Nicholson,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01200640991

Agency No. 2004-0659-2006100

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated May 18, 2006, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was

properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure

to state a claim.

In a complaint dated April 17, 2006, complainant alleged that the agency

discriminated against her on the basis of reprisal for prior protected

EEO activity when, on November 22, 2005, a Nurse Manager (S1) issued

her a verbal counseling with documentation.

On May 18, 2006, the agency issued a final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint, stating that complainant was not aggrieved by

S1's action of November 22. The agency explained that S1 gave complainant

a letter confirming their conversation and that said letter was not placed

in complainant's official personnel folder so a disciplinary action did

not occur. The record contains a memorandum dated November 22, 2005,

from S1, titled "Confirmation of Verbal Counseling, Excessive Tardiness."

The memorandum refers to the conversation between complainant and S1 of

the same day and lists complainant's tardy instances between October 24

and November 22, 2005. In addition, the record contains a memorandum

from S1

stating that no documentation was placed in complainant's personnel file

or any other file and that the confirmation letter served only as future

reference for complainant.

The Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim under the

EEOC regulations because complainant failed to show that she suffered harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. See Diaz v. Dep't of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994). We have found repeatedly

in the past that issues concerning verbal reprimands and threats of

discipline without more do not state an actionable claim. See, e.g.,

Ball v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01A40996 (March 17,

2004) (finding that a verbal reprimand and interview for discipline is

not enough to state a claim). Accordingly, the agency's final decision

dismissing complainant's complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact

on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 9, 2007

__________________

Date

1 Due to a new Commission data system, this case has been redesignated

with the above-referenced appeal number.

??

??

??

??

2

0120064099

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0120064099