01a55542
12-28-2005
Bronco Bostick, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area) Agency.
Bronco Bostick v. United States Postal Service
01A55542
December 28,, 2005
.
Bronco Bostick,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
(Southeast Area)
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A55542
Agency No. 4H-310-0100-03
Hearing No. 140-2005-00156X
DECISION
Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405, the Commission accepts complainant's
appeal from the agency's final order in the above-entitled matter.
Complainant alleged that the agency discriminated against him on the bases
of race (African-American), sex (male), disability (hearing loss), age
(D.O.B. 2/23/56), and in reprisal for prior EEO activity when, on June
12, 2003, he was issued a Letter of Warning.
The Administrative Judge (AJ) concluded that summary judgment was proper
since complainant failed to provide evidence supporting the finding
that he was treated less favorably than similarly situated employees.
For example, the AJ notes that one identified comparative was a
supervisor and the other was complainant's subordinate. In addition,
the AJ found no genuine dispute of material fact on the issue of pretext
or discriminatory animus. Specifically, the AJ noted that the Letter of
Warning was issued to complainant for the failure to perform his duties
in a satisfactory manner. The undisputed record shows that complainant
failed to approve E-Travel authorizations and allowed other people to
call in on behalf of employees to report their absence in violation of
the agency's policy and expectations. The AJ concluded that complainant
failed to present evidence of pretext.
On appeal, complainant disputes the agency's version of the events
with uncorroborated self-serving statements which we agree are not
sufficient to raise a genuine dispute of material fact. Accordingly,
after a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration
of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission to affirm the agency's final order,
because the Administrative Judge's issuance of a decision without a
hearing was appropriate and a preponderance of the record evidence does
not establish that discrimination occurred.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
December 28, 2005
__________________
Date